Hybrid: reasoning with higher-order abstract syntax in coq and isabelle

MSFP '10 Pub Date : 2010-09-25 DOI:10.1145/1863597.1863599
A. Felty
{"title":"Hybrid: reasoning with higher-order abstract syntax in coq and isabelle","authors":"A. Felty","doi":"10.1145/1863597.1863599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present recent work on the Hybrid system, a logical framework for specifying and reasoning about languages and deductive systems. One of the main areas of application of this system is developing formal proofs of properties of programming languages. It is well-known that those languages that are formally proven to be sound can better provide a solid basis for building software systems that are reliable and secure.\n Hybrid is designed to exploit the advantages of higher-order abstract syntax within the well-understood setting of higher-order logic as implemented in a variety of general theorem proving systems. It is currently implemented in both Isabelle/HOL and Coq.\n Hybrid is definitional and introduces no new axioms. In particular, a de Bruijn representation of lambda-terms provides a definitional layer that allows the user to represent object languages using higher-order abstract syntax, while offering tools for reasoning about them at the higher level.\n We describe a variety of features of Hybrid, including two-level reasoning and inductive reasoning about open terms, and we present case studies to illustrate these features. We also discuss both classical and constructive versions of Hybrid.","PeriodicalId":355206,"journal":{"name":"MSFP '10","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MSFP '10","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1863597.1863599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We present recent work on the Hybrid system, a logical framework for specifying and reasoning about languages and deductive systems. One of the main areas of application of this system is developing formal proofs of properties of programming languages. It is well-known that those languages that are formally proven to be sound can better provide a solid basis for building software systems that are reliable and secure. Hybrid is designed to exploit the advantages of higher-order abstract syntax within the well-understood setting of higher-order logic as implemented in a variety of general theorem proving systems. It is currently implemented in both Isabelle/HOL and Coq. Hybrid is definitional and introduces no new axioms. In particular, a de Bruijn representation of lambda-terms provides a definitional layer that allows the user to represent object languages using higher-order abstract syntax, while offering tools for reasoning about them at the higher level. We describe a variety of features of Hybrid, including two-level reasoning and inductive reasoning about open terms, and we present case studies to illustrate these features. We also discuss both classical and constructive versions of Hybrid.
混合:在coq和isabelle中使用高阶抽象语法进行推理
我们介绍了最近在混合系统上的工作,这是一个用于指定和推理语言和演绎系统的逻辑框架。该系统的主要应用领域之一是开发编程语言性质的形式化证明。众所周知,那些被正式证明是可靠的语言可以更好地为构建可靠和安全的软件系统提供坚实的基础。Hybrid的设计目的是利用高阶抽象语法的优势,在各种一般定理证明系统中实现的高阶逻辑的良好理解设置。它目前在Isabelle/HOL和Coq中都实现了。混合是定义的,不引入新的公理。特别是,lambda术语的de Bruijn表示提供了一个定义层,允许用户使用高阶抽象语法表示对象语言,同时提供了在更高级别上对它们进行推理的工具。我们描述了Hybrid的各种特征,包括关于开放项的两级推理和归纳推理,并提供了案例研究来说明这些特征。我们还讨论了Hybrid的经典版本和建设性版本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信