Measurement Precision with Ordinal Categorical Data considering Dose-response Relationships

Shunsuke Tanigaki, J. Takeshita, Shizu Itaka, Tomomichi Suzuki
{"title":"Measurement Precision with Ordinal Categorical Data considering Dose-response Relationships","authors":"Shunsuke Tanigaki, J. Takeshita, Shizu Itaka, Tomomichi Suzuki","doi":"10.17929/tqs.7.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Evaluating measurement methods is important to perform quality assurance of measurement results. This study aims to estimate the measurement precision of ordinal categorical data. ISO 5725-1 states that precision of measurement methods can be quantified by conducting precision evaluation experiments, and ISO 5725-2 provides a methodology to evaluate the measurement precision for quantitative data. Regarding qualitative data, some previous studies exist on quantifying the precision of binary and multinomial data. However, no reasonable methodologies have yet been established. Thus, this study proposes the analysis method for the data obtained from a collaborative study on intratracheal administration testing for assessing effects in rat lungs. A primary objective of the collaborative study was to demonstrate dose-response relationships. To investigate the dose-response relationships, hypothesis tests such as a Cochran–Armitage trend test and a cumulative chi-squared test were performed, which are applicable even for ordinal categorical data. Moreover, logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the dose-response relationships and the precision among laboratories. This result was expressed by 50% efficient dose ( 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 50 ) and area under the curve (AUC). Then, we obtained that a dose-response relationship was observed for each laboratory, and the differences in the relationships among laboratories expressed precision.","PeriodicalId":301168,"journal":{"name":"Total Quality Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Total Quality Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17929/tqs.7.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Evaluating measurement methods is important to perform quality assurance of measurement results. This study aims to estimate the measurement precision of ordinal categorical data. ISO 5725-1 states that precision of measurement methods can be quantified by conducting precision evaluation experiments, and ISO 5725-2 provides a methodology to evaluate the measurement precision for quantitative data. Regarding qualitative data, some previous studies exist on quantifying the precision of binary and multinomial data. However, no reasonable methodologies have yet been established. Thus, this study proposes the analysis method for the data obtained from a collaborative study on intratracheal administration testing for assessing effects in rat lungs. A primary objective of the collaborative study was to demonstrate dose-response relationships. To investigate the dose-response relationships, hypothesis tests such as a Cochran–Armitage trend test and a cumulative chi-squared test were performed, which are applicable even for ordinal categorical data. Moreover, logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the dose-response relationships and the precision among laboratories. This result was expressed by 50% efficient dose ( 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 50 ) and area under the curve (AUC). Then, we obtained that a dose-response relationship was observed for each laboratory, and the differences in the relationships among laboratories expressed precision.
考虑剂量-反应关系的有序分类数据测量精度
评价测量方法对测量结果的质量保证很重要。本研究旨在估计有序分类数据的测量精度。ISO 5725-1规定测量方法的精度可以通过进行精度评价实验来量化,ISO 5725-2提供了定量数据的测量精度评价方法。对于定性数据,已有一些关于量化二叉和多项数据精度的研究。但是,目前还没有确定合理的方法。因此,本研究提出了一项气管内给药试验的合作研究数据的分析方法,以评估对大鼠肺的影响。合作研究的主要目的是证明剂量-反应关系。为了研究剂量-反应关系,进行了假设检验,如Cochran-Armitage趋势检验和累积卡方检验,这些检验甚至适用于有序分类数据。采用logistic回归分析检验各实验室间的剂量-反应关系和精度。该结果用50%有效剂量( 50)和曲线下面积(AUC)表示。然后,我们得到每个实验室都观察到剂量-反应关系,并且实验室之间关系的差异表达了精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书