Comparing the Result of Mathematics Learning Between Reciprocal Teaching and Students’ Facilitator and Explaining by Controlling Early Ability

D. Mulyono, M. Asmawi, P. Priyono
{"title":"Comparing the Result of Mathematics Learning Between Reciprocal Teaching and Students’ Facilitator and Explaining by Controlling Early Ability","authors":"D. Mulyono, M. Asmawi, P. Priyono","doi":"10.4108/eai.21-11-2018.2282027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the mathematics learning outcomes using high and low reciprocal teaching-learning models, and student facilitator model, with high and low learning independence to explain students' initial abilities. The research made use of the experimental method. A two-way Anacova method was used to test for hypothesis. Hypothesis 1 indicates that H0 is rejected based on t-test statistics with a value of 4.90, which is greater than t table (0.01; 59) value of 2.39. Hypothesis 2 analysis shows that H0 is rejected based on t-test statistics, with a t count value of -1.83, which is greater than t table (0.05; 59) value of-1.67.","PeriodicalId":141518,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technology and Educational Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technology and Educational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.21-11-2018.2282027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine the mathematics learning outcomes using high and low reciprocal teaching-learning models, and student facilitator model, with high and low learning independence to explain students' initial abilities. The research made use of the experimental method. A two-way Anacova method was used to test for hypothesis. Hypothesis 1 indicates that H0 is rejected based on t-test statistics with a value of 4.90, which is greater than t table (0.01; 59) value of 2.39. Hypothesis 2 analysis shows that H0 is rejected based on t-test statistics, with a t count value of -1.83, which is greater than t table (0.05; 59) value of-1.67.
互惠教学与学生引导者及控制早期能力解说的数学学习效果比较
本研究旨在利用高低互反的教与学模型、高低学习独立性的学生引导者模型来确定数学学习成果,以解释学生的初始能力。这项研究采用了实验方法。采用双向Anacova方法对假设进行检验。假设1表明,基于t检验统计量,H0被拒绝,其值为4.90,大于t表(0.01;59)值2.39。假设2分析表明,基于t检验统计量,H0被拒绝,t计数值为-1.83,大于t表(0.05;59) value -1.67。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信