Do advisors improve IPO outcomes?

Emmanuel Pezier, H. Jones
{"title":"Do advisors improve IPO outcomes?","authors":"Emmanuel Pezier, H. Jones","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3400906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Issuers increasingly appoint advisors in IPOs alongside underwriters. We find advisors in aggregate have no effect on first-day returns, withdrawals, or underwriting spreads in European IPOs. However, underpricing of IPOs with generalist advisors (who offer diverse services alongside IPOs) is significantly greater than with specialist IPO advisors and is at the expense of unsophisticated issuers. We link these findings to the different incentives of generalist and specialist advisors. Our results are consistent with naivety on the part of unsophisticated issuers, but more likely with unsophisticated issuers willingly paying for the reputational and other benefits of generalist advisors with IPO underpricing.","PeriodicalId":445238,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) (Sub-Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3400906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Issuers increasingly appoint advisors in IPOs alongside underwriters. We find advisors in aggregate have no effect on first-day returns, withdrawals, or underwriting spreads in European IPOs. However, underpricing of IPOs with generalist advisors (who offer diverse services alongside IPOs) is significantly greater than with specialist IPO advisors and is at the expense of unsophisticated issuers. We link these findings to the different incentives of generalist and specialist advisors. Our results are consistent with naivety on the part of unsophisticated issuers, but more likely with unsophisticated issuers willingly paying for the reputational and other benefits of generalist advisors with IPO underpricing.
顾问能改善IPO结果吗?
发行人越来越多地在ipo中任命顾问和承销商。我们发现,总体而言,顾问对欧洲ipo首日收益、撤资或承销价差没有影响。然而,与专业IPO顾问相比,通才顾问(在IPO的同时提供多种服务)对IPO定价过低的情况要严重得多,这损害了不成熟的发行者的利益。我们将这些发现与多面手和专业顾问的不同激励机制联系起来。我们的结果与不成熟的发行者的天真一致,但更有可能的是,不成熟的发行者愿意为IPO定价过低的通才顾问的声誉和其他好处买单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信