Giving the Public Due Notice in Song China and Renaissance Rome

P. Ebrey, Margaret Meserve
{"title":"Giving the Public Due Notice in Song China and Renaissance Rome","authors":"P. Ebrey, Margaret Meserve","doi":"10.1017/9789048551002.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores the similarities and differences in methods of\n conveying information to common people in two societies where printing\n was coming into greater use — the huge agrarian empire of Song\n China (tenth to thirteen centuries) and the city of Renaissance Rome\n (fourteenth to fifteenth centuries). The Song material is strongest on the\n bureaucratic reasons for posting notices and the language used in them.\n Authors preserved hundreds of notices, probably seeing in them proof of\n their serious commitment to promoting the welfare of the people under\n them. The sources for notice-posting in Renaissance Rome are fuller on\n the practices associated with circulating notices throughout the city\n on church doors both by the papacy and by its critics, who sometimes\n posted satirical or contemptuous notices at the same sites. The posting of\n notices in Renaissance Rome was a bureaucratic practice that had strong\n ritualistic overtones, was often highly politicized, and therefore could\n easily be subverted by critics of the regime.","PeriodicalId":162015,"journal":{"name":"Political Communication in Chinese and European History, 800–1600","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Communication in Chinese and European History, 800–1600","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048551002.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter explores the similarities and differences in methods of conveying information to common people in two societies where printing was coming into greater use — the huge agrarian empire of Song China (tenth to thirteen centuries) and the city of Renaissance Rome (fourteenth to fifteenth centuries). The Song material is strongest on the bureaucratic reasons for posting notices and the language used in them. Authors preserved hundreds of notices, probably seeing in them proof of their serious commitment to promoting the welfare of the people under them. The sources for notice-posting in Renaissance Rome are fuller on the practices associated with circulating notices throughout the city on church doors both by the papacy and by its critics, who sometimes posted satirical or contemptuous notices at the same sites. The posting of notices in Renaissance Rome was a bureaucratic practice that had strong ritualistic overtones, was often highly politicized, and therefore could easily be subverted by critics of the regime.
宋代中国与文艺复兴时期罗马的公众应有的关注
这一章探讨了两个社会在向普通人传递信息的方法上的异同,这两个社会的印刷术得到了更大的应用——巨大的农业帝国宋朝(10至13世纪)和文艺复兴时期的城市罗马(14至15世纪)。宋朝的材料在发布公告的官僚主义原因和其中使用的语言方面表现得最为突出。作者们保存了数百份通知,可能是把它们看作是他们致力于促进其下属福利的证据。文艺复兴时期罗马张贴布告的资料更充分地记载了教皇及其批评者在整个城市的教堂门上张贴布告的做法,这些人有时会在同一地点张贴讽刺或轻蔑的布告。在文艺复兴时期的罗马,张贴告示是一种带有强烈仪式色彩的官僚做法,往往高度政治化,因此很容易被政权的批评者颠覆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信