A framework for analyzing community detection algorithms

A. Biswas, Bhaskar Biswas
{"title":"A framework for analyzing community detection algorithms","authors":"A. Biswas, Bhaskar Biswas","doi":"10.1109/TECHSYM.2016.7872656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evaluation of community detection algorithms is very important to ensure both accuracy and quality of identified communities. Measuring quality incorporates edges, while measuring accuracy involves node labels. Due to this fundamental difference between accuracy and quality, often the evaluation process confronts with the issues such as trade-off between the two. In addition, real world networks such as social networks are of unknown structure and complex. Accuracy of communities detected with any algorithm for these networks cannot be measured due to unavailability of ground truth. In such cases, the algorithms are certainly more likely to predict accurate communities that show higher inclination towards accuracy in the networks where ground truths are available. In this paper, a framework is proposed to analyze Relative Inclination Towards accuracy (RITA) of a set of community detection algorithms. The RITA analysis gives an intuition about how likely an algorithm would produce accurate communities in the networks where ground truth is not available. Moreover, the RITA analysis overcomes trade-off between accuracy and quality by incorporating both into a common platform. Results on variety of networks show the competency of proposed framework in dealing with the trade-off during analysis.","PeriodicalId":403350,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE Students’ Technology Symposium (TechSym)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE Students’ Technology Symposium (TechSym)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TECHSYM.2016.7872656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Evaluation of community detection algorithms is very important to ensure both accuracy and quality of identified communities. Measuring quality incorporates edges, while measuring accuracy involves node labels. Due to this fundamental difference between accuracy and quality, often the evaluation process confronts with the issues such as trade-off between the two. In addition, real world networks such as social networks are of unknown structure and complex. Accuracy of communities detected with any algorithm for these networks cannot be measured due to unavailability of ground truth. In such cases, the algorithms are certainly more likely to predict accurate communities that show higher inclination towards accuracy in the networks where ground truths are available. In this paper, a framework is proposed to analyze Relative Inclination Towards accuracy (RITA) of a set of community detection algorithms. The RITA analysis gives an intuition about how likely an algorithm would produce accurate communities in the networks where ground truth is not available. Moreover, the RITA analysis overcomes trade-off between accuracy and quality by incorporating both into a common platform. Results on variety of networks show the competency of proposed framework in dealing with the trade-off during analysis.
社区检测算法分析框架
社区检测算法的评价对于保证识别社区的准确性和质量是非常重要的。测量质量包含边缘,而测量精度包含节点标签。由于准确性和质量之间的这种根本区别,评估过程经常面临两者之间权衡的问题。另外,现实世界的网络,如社会网络,具有未知的结构和复杂性。由于无法获得地面真实值,因此无法测量用这些网络的任何算法检测到的社区的准确性。在这种情况下,算法当然更有可能预测出准确的社区,这些社区在可以获得基础事实的网络中表现出更高的准确性倾向。本文提出了一个框架来分析一组社区检测算法的相对精度倾向(RITA)。RITA分析给出了一种直觉,即在无法获得地面真相的网络中,算法产生准确社区的可能性有多大。此外,通过将准确性和质量合并到一个公共平台中,RITA分析克服了准确性和质量之间的权衡。在各种网络上的结果表明,所提出的框架在分析过程中处理权衡的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信