Reliability of the 1 RM bench press and squat in young women

Sofia Ryman Augustsson, U. Svantesson
{"title":"Reliability of the 1 RM bench press and squat in young women","authors":"Sofia Ryman Augustsson, U. Svantesson","doi":"10.3109/21679169.2013.810305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Although bench press and squat are two of the most frequently performed strength training exercises today, and are used for physical performance assessment in many sports test batteries as well as in physical therapy, studies presenting inter-rater reliability for these tests in young women appear to be lacking in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate inter-rater reliability regarding the One Repetition Maximum (1 RM) in bench press and squats in young healthy women. Forty-one women, aged 21–30 years, participated in the present study. The subjects performed 1 RM bench press (n = 21) or 1 RM squat (n = 20) on two different occasions with an interval of 5–9 days using an inter-rater test-retest design. High reliability was noted for both the 1 RM bench press test (ICC2,1 = 0.98) and the 1 RM squat test (ICC2,1 = 0.85), with an SEM of 4% and 11%, respectively. The paired analysis revealed statistically significant difference in 1 RM squat performance between the two test sessions (p = 0.005). No statistically significant difference was found in 1 RM bench press performance between the two testing sessions. While the 1RM bench press showed excellent inter-rater reliability and could be strongly suggested as a measurement of muscle strength, the squat using free weights, as in the present study, could be questioned.","PeriodicalId":186472,"journal":{"name":"The European Journal of Physiotherapy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Journal of Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/21679169.2013.810305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Abstract Although bench press and squat are two of the most frequently performed strength training exercises today, and are used for physical performance assessment in many sports test batteries as well as in physical therapy, studies presenting inter-rater reliability for these tests in young women appear to be lacking in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate inter-rater reliability regarding the One Repetition Maximum (1 RM) in bench press and squats in young healthy women. Forty-one women, aged 21–30 years, participated in the present study. The subjects performed 1 RM bench press (n = 21) or 1 RM squat (n = 20) on two different occasions with an interval of 5–9 days using an inter-rater test-retest design. High reliability was noted for both the 1 RM bench press test (ICC2,1 = 0.98) and the 1 RM squat test (ICC2,1 = 0.85), with an SEM of 4% and 11%, respectively. The paired analysis revealed statistically significant difference in 1 RM squat performance between the two test sessions (p = 0.005). No statistically significant difference was found in 1 RM bench press performance between the two testing sessions. While the 1RM bench press showed excellent inter-rater reliability and could be strongly suggested as a measurement of muscle strength, the squat using free weights, as in the present study, could be questioned.
1 RM卧推和深蹲在年轻女性中的可靠性
虽然卧推和深蹲是当今最常进行的两种力量训练,并且在许多运动测试电池和物理治疗中用于身体表现评估,但在文献中缺乏这些测试在年轻女性中的内部可靠性研究。本研究的目的是评估年轻健康女性卧推和深蹲中单次最大重复(1 RM)的评分间信度。41名年龄在21-30岁之间的女性参与了本研究。受试者在两个不同的场合进行1次RM卧推(n = 21)或1次RM深蹲(n = 20),间隔5-9天,采用评分者间测试-重测设计。1 RM卧推测试(ICC2,1 = 0.98)和1 RM深蹲测试(ICC2,1 = 0.85)都有高信度,SEM分别为4%和11%。配对分析显示,两个测试阶段的1 RM深蹲性能差异有统计学意义(p = 0.005)。在两个测试阶段之间,1 RM卧推机的性能没有统计学上的显著差异。虽然1RM卧推显示出出色的评分间可靠性,并且可以强烈建议作为肌肉力量的测量,但在本研究中,使用自由重量的深蹲可能会受到质疑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书