The impact of criterion weights techniques in TOPSIS method of multi-criteria decision making in crisp and intuitionistic fuzzy domains

F. Dammak, Leila Baccour, A. Alimi
{"title":"The impact of criterion weights techniques in TOPSIS method of multi-criteria decision making in crisp and intuitionistic fuzzy domains","authors":"F. Dammak, Leila Baccour, A. Alimi","doi":"10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE.2015.7338116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In MCDM problems some criteria (attributes) having different importance are used to determine a best alternative from many. Thus, different weight methods exist in literature to evaluate the importance of each criteria. In this work TOPSIS, multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) method is applied using crisp data set with different techniques of weight proposed in literature. Therefore, intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS is applied on intuitionistic fuzzy data set (IFS) using methods of weights existing in literature. The latter are intuitionistic generalization of crisp weights. We propose to extend two methods of weight computation, the Standard Deviation (SD) and the preference selection index (PSI) to intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Obtained results are compared to assess the impact of methods of weight in the result of decision making methods.","PeriodicalId":185191,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE.2015.7338116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

In MCDM problems some criteria (attributes) having different importance are used to determine a best alternative from many. Thus, different weight methods exist in literature to evaluate the importance of each criteria. In this work TOPSIS, multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) method is applied using crisp data set with different techniques of weight proposed in literature. Therefore, intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS is applied on intuitionistic fuzzy data set (IFS) using methods of weights existing in literature. The latter are intuitionistic generalization of crisp weights. We propose to extend two methods of weight computation, the Standard Deviation (SD) and the preference selection index (PSI) to intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Obtained results are compared to assess the impact of methods of weight in the result of decision making methods.
清晰直觉模糊域多准则决策TOPSIS方法中准则权重技术的影响
在MCDM问题中,一些具有不同重要性的标准(属性)被用来从众多标准(属性)中确定一个最佳方案。因此,文献中存在不同的权重方法来评估每个标准的重要性。本文采用多准则决策(MCDM)方法,结合文献中提出的不同权重技术,利用清晰的数据集进行决策。因此,利用文献中已有的权重方法,将直觉模糊TOPSIS应用于直觉模糊数据集。后者是对脆度权重的直观概括。我们提出将两种权重计算方法——标准差(SD)和偏好选择指数(PSI)推广到直觉模糊集。对所得结果进行比较,评价权重方法对结果决策方法的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信