Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics in Programming: Literature Review and Case Studies

Petri Ihantola, Arto Vihavainen, A. Ahadi, M. Butler, J. Börstler, S. Edwards, Essi Isohanni, A. Korhonen, Andrew Petersen, Kelly Rivers, M. A. Rubio, J. Sheard, Bronius Skupas, Jaime Spacco, Claudia Szabo, Daniel Toll
{"title":"Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics in Programming: Literature Review and Case Studies","authors":"Petri Ihantola, Arto Vihavainen, A. Ahadi, M. Butler, J. Börstler, S. Edwards, Essi Isohanni, A. Korhonen, Andrew Petersen, Kelly Rivers, M. A. Rubio, J. Sheard, Bronius Skupas, Jaime Spacco, Claudia Szabo, Daniel Toll","doi":"10.1145/2858796.2858798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Educational data mining and learning analytics promise better understanding of student behavior and knowledge, as well as new information on the tacit factors that contribute to student actions. This knowledge can be used to inform decisions related to course and tool design and pedagogy, and to further engage students and guide those at risk of failure. This working group report provides an overview of the body of knowledge regarding the use of educational data mining and learning analytics focused on the teaching and learning of programming. In a literature survey on mining students' programming processes for 2005-2015, we observe a significant increase in work related to the field. However, the majority of the studies focus on simplistic metric analysis and are conducted within a single institution and a single course. This indicates the existence of further avenues of research and a critical need for validation and replication to better understand the various contributing factors and the reasons why certain results occur. We introduce a novel taxonomy to analyse replicating studies and discuss the importance of replicating and reproducing previous work. We describe what is the state of the art in collecting and sharing programming data. To better understand the challenges involved in replicating or reproducing existing studies, we report our experiences from three case studies using programming data. Finally, we present a discussion of future directions for the education and research community.","PeriodicalId":141200,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2015 ITiCSE on Working Group Reports","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"292","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2015 ITiCSE on Working Group Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2858796.2858798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 292

Abstract

Educational data mining and learning analytics promise better understanding of student behavior and knowledge, as well as new information on the tacit factors that contribute to student actions. This knowledge can be used to inform decisions related to course and tool design and pedagogy, and to further engage students and guide those at risk of failure. This working group report provides an overview of the body of knowledge regarding the use of educational data mining and learning analytics focused on the teaching and learning of programming. In a literature survey on mining students' programming processes for 2005-2015, we observe a significant increase in work related to the field. However, the majority of the studies focus on simplistic metric analysis and are conducted within a single institution and a single course. This indicates the existence of further avenues of research and a critical need for validation and replication to better understand the various contributing factors and the reasons why certain results occur. We introduce a novel taxonomy to analyse replicating studies and discuss the importance of replicating and reproducing previous work. We describe what is the state of the art in collecting and sharing programming data. To better understand the challenges involved in replicating or reproducing existing studies, we report our experiences from three case studies using programming data. Finally, we present a discussion of future directions for the education and research community.
编程中的教育数据挖掘和学习分析:文献回顾和案例研究
教育数据挖掘和学习分析有望更好地理解学生的行为和知识,以及有助于学生行为的隐性因素的新信息。这些知识可以用来为与课程和工具设计和教学相关的决策提供信息,并进一步吸引学生并指导那些有失败风险的学生。本工作组报告概述了关于使用教育数据挖掘和学习分析的知识体系,重点是编程的教学和学习。在一项关于2005-2015年采矿学生编程过程的文献调查中,我们观察到与该领域相关的工作显著增加。然而,大多数研究侧重于简单的度量分析,并在单一机构和单一课程中进行。这表明存在进一步的研究途径,并且迫切需要验证和复制,以更好地了解各种促成因素和某些结果发生的原因。我们介绍了一种新的分类法来分析重复性研究,并讨论了复制和再现以前工作的重要性。我们描述了收集和共享编程数据的最新技术。为了更好地理解复制或再现现有研究所涉及的挑战,我们报告了使用编程数据的三个案例研究的经验。最后,我们对教育和研究界的未来发展方向进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信