A parameterized approach to deal with sock puppets

Tanya Gera, Jaiteg Singh
{"title":"A parameterized approach to deal with sock puppets","authors":"Tanya Gera, Jaiteg Singh","doi":"10.1109/C3IT.2015.7060150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Opinion these days is considered vital to attract probable customers; hence e-commerce websites are facilitating the existing customers to share their experiences about the products they have used. The dawn of e-commerce business has resulted into some firms, which post reviews that are carefully designed to influence the opinion of prospective customers. Review sites provide an open platform for everyone to share their experiences but authenticity of the reviews is not assured thereby affecting customers' buying decisions. Reviews which are not genuine are generally termed as spam. For many years, email spam and web spam were the two socially discussed opinion issues. Nowadays, due to popularity of online shopping and customer's dependence on the online reviews, it became a major target for review spammers to mislead customers by writing untruthful reviews for target products. Opinion spammers may write reprehensible positive opinions in order to promote some target objects or by giving beguiling negative opinions to some other objects in order to damage their reputation. Writing fake review is an unethical activity, also known as shilling. To the best of our knowledge, not much study is reported to evaluate trustworthiness of online reviews. In the past few years, variety of techniques has been recommended by researchers to accord with this trouble. This paper intends to introduce parameterized approach for identifying suspicions, review spammers and their group considering geographical statistics and networking parameters.","PeriodicalId":402311,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2015 Third International Conference on Computer, Communication, Control and Information Technology (C3IT)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2015 Third International Conference on Computer, Communication, Control and Information Technology (C3IT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/C3IT.2015.7060150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Opinion these days is considered vital to attract probable customers; hence e-commerce websites are facilitating the existing customers to share their experiences about the products they have used. The dawn of e-commerce business has resulted into some firms, which post reviews that are carefully designed to influence the opinion of prospective customers. Review sites provide an open platform for everyone to share their experiences but authenticity of the reviews is not assured thereby affecting customers' buying decisions. Reviews which are not genuine are generally termed as spam. For many years, email spam and web spam were the two socially discussed opinion issues. Nowadays, due to popularity of online shopping and customer's dependence on the online reviews, it became a major target for review spammers to mislead customers by writing untruthful reviews for target products. Opinion spammers may write reprehensible positive opinions in order to promote some target objects or by giving beguiling negative opinions to some other objects in order to damage their reputation. Writing fake review is an unethical activity, also known as shilling. To the best of our knowledge, not much study is reported to evaluate trustworthiness of online reviews. In the past few years, variety of techniques has been recommended by researchers to accord with this trouble. This paper intends to introduce parameterized approach for identifying suspicions, review spammers and their group considering geographical statistics and networking parameters.
一种处理袜子木偶的参数化方法
如今,舆论被认为是吸引潜在客户的关键因素;因此,电子商务网站为现有客户分享他们使用过的产品的经验提供了便利。电子商务的曙光已经产生了一些公司,他们发布的评论是精心设计的,以影响潜在客户的意见。评论网站为每个人提供了一个开放的平台来分享他们的经验,但评论的真实性并没有得到保证,从而影响了客户的购买决策。不真实的评论通常被称为垃圾评论。多年来,电子邮件垃圾邮件和网络垃圾邮件是两个社会讨论的意见问题。如今,由于网上购物的普及和消费者对网上评论的依赖,通过对目标产品撰写不真实的评论来误导消费者成为垃圾评论者的主要目标。垃圾意见散布者可能为了宣传某些目标对象而撰写应受谴责的正面意见,也可能为了损害其他对象的声誉而给出具有欺骗性的负面意见。写虚假评论是一种不道德的行为,也被称为先令。据我们所知,没有多少研究报告评估在线评论的可信度。在过去的几年里,研究人员已经推荐了各种技术来解决这个问题。本文提出了一种基于地理统计和网络参数的参数化方法来识别可疑、审查垃圾邮件发送者及其群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信