Privacy in the Semantic Web: What Policy Languages Have to Offer

Claudiu Duma, Almut Herzog, N. Shahmehri
{"title":"Privacy in the Semantic Web: What Policy Languages Have to Offer","authors":"Claudiu Duma, Almut Herzog, N. Shahmehri","doi":"10.1109/POLICY.2007.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Uncontrolled disclosure of sensitive information during electronic transactions may expose users to threats like loss of privacy and identity theft. The means envisioned for addressing protection of security and privacy in the context of the Semantic Web are policy languages for trust establishment and management. Although a number of policy languages have been proposed, it is unclear how well each language can address users' privacy concerns. The contribution of this work is an independent, scenario-based comparison of six prominent policy languages, namely Protune, Rei, Ponder, Trust-X, KeyNote and P3P-APPEL, with respect to the needs that users have in protecting their personal, sensitive data. We present how each language addresses access control for objects, such as user credentials and sensitive policies. We evaluate how each language defines or imports hierarchies of resources, whether the language supports protection of user information after it has been released, whether the language supports the principle of least privilege and more. The evaluation is not only an analytical literature study but also rich in actual implementations in all six languages.","PeriodicalId":240693,"journal":{"name":"Eighth IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks (POLICY'07)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"47","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eighth IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks (POLICY'07)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/POLICY.2007.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

Abstract

Uncontrolled disclosure of sensitive information during electronic transactions may expose users to threats like loss of privacy and identity theft. The means envisioned for addressing protection of security and privacy in the context of the Semantic Web are policy languages for trust establishment and management. Although a number of policy languages have been proposed, it is unclear how well each language can address users' privacy concerns. The contribution of this work is an independent, scenario-based comparison of six prominent policy languages, namely Protune, Rei, Ponder, Trust-X, KeyNote and P3P-APPEL, with respect to the needs that users have in protecting their personal, sensitive data. We present how each language addresses access control for objects, such as user credentials and sensitive policies. We evaluate how each language defines or imports hierarchies of resources, whether the language supports protection of user information after it has been released, whether the language supports the principle of least privilege and more. The evaluation is not only an analytical literature study but also rich in actual implementations in all six languages.
语义网中的隐私:策略语言必须提供什么
在电子交易过程中不受控制地披露敏感信息可能会使用户面临隐私丢失和身份被盗等威胁。在语义Web上下文中处理安全和隐私保护的方法是用于建立和管理信任的策略语言。尽管已经提出了许多政策语言,但目前尚不清楚每种语言能在多大程度上解决用户的隐私问题。这项工作的贡献是对Protune、Rei、Ponder、Trust-X、KeyNote和p2p - appel六种主要政策语言进行独立的、基于场景的比较,以满足用户在保护其个人敏感数据方面的需求。我们将介绍每种语言如何处理对象的访问控制,例如用户凭据和敏感策略。我们评估每种语言如何定义或导入资源的层次结构,该语言是否支持在用户信息发布后对其进行保护,该语言是否支持最小特权原则等等。该评价不仅是一种分析性的文献研究,而且具有丰富的六种语言的实际实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信