Comparison of ICT equipment air-intake temperatures between cold aisle containment and hot aisle containment in datacenters

A. Tsuda, Yosuke Mino, S. Nishimura
{"title":"Comparison of ICT equipment air-intake temperatures between cold aisle containment and hot aisle containment in datacenters","authors":"A. Tsuda, Yosuke Mino, S. Nishimura","doi":"10.1109/INTLEC.2017.8211679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this paper is to clarify the differences between cold aisle containment (CAC) and hot aisle containment (HAC) with regard to the air-intake temperature of the ICT equipment in the rack. Thus, we constructed a system in which these two capping methods could be compared under the same load and air-conditioned environment, and measured those thermal environments. When the ICT equipment is installed vertically in the middle of the rack, the air-intake temperature with CAC was lower than that with HAC. The average difference was 1°;C, and 3°;C on the upper intake side. We also adjusted the air-intake temperatures of the ICT equipment to the equivalent level under both types of aisle containment by controlling the air-conditioning supplied air volume. As a result, when each air-intake temperature was kept at the same level under capping methods in the test environment, the air-conditioning fan power consumption with HAC was twice that with CAC. This demonstrates that the CAC can save more energy consumed by air-conditioning systems as it easily retains the low temperature conditions.","PeriodicalId":366207,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE International Telecommunications Energy Conference (INTELEC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE International Telecommunications Energy Conference (INTELEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INTLEC.2017.8211679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to clarify the differences between cold aisle containment (CAC) and hot aisle containment (HAC) with regard to the air-intake temperature of the ICT equipment in the rack. Thus, we constructed a system in which these two capping methods could be compared under the same load and air-conditioned environment, and measured those thermal environments. When the ICT equipment is installed vertically in the middle of the rack, the air-intake temperature with CAC was lower than that with HAC. The average difference was 1°;C, and 3°;C on the upper intake side. We also adjusted the air-intake temperatures of the ICT equipment to the equivalent level under both types of aisle containment by controlling the air-conditioning supplied air volume. As a result, when each air-intake temperature was kept at the same level under capping methods in the test environment, the air-conditioning fan power consumption with HAC was twice that with CAC. This demonstrates that the CAC can save more energy consumed by air-conditioning systems as it easily retains the low temperature conditions.
数据中心ICT设备冷通道密封与热通道密封进气温度的比较
本文的目的是澄清冷通道密封(CAC)和热通道密封(HAC)之间的差异,关于ICT设备在机架中的进气温度。因此,我们构建了一个系统,在相同的负荷和空调环境下,可以比较这两种封顶方法,并对热环境进行了测量。ICT设备垂直安装在机架中部时,CAC进风温度低于HAC进风温度。平均差值为1°C,上进气侧差值为3°C。我们亦透过控制空调的送风量,将资讯及通讯科技设备的进风温度调整至两种密闭通道下的同等水平。结果表明,在测试环境中,当封顶方式下各进气温度保持在同一水平时,采用HAC的空调风机功耗是采用CAC的空调风机功耗的2倍。这说明空调系统可以较容易地保持低温环境,从而节省更多空调系统所消耗的能源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信