Extracting Process Instances from User Interaction Logs

Lars Kornahrens, Sebastian Kritzler, Dirk Werth
{"title":"Extracting Process Instances from User Interaction Logs","authors":"Lars Kornahrens, Sebastian Kritzler, Dirk Werth","doi":"10.1145/3573834.3574538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thoroughly documenting digital business processes in a company is a crucial and necessary, yet cumbersome task. However, having detailed documentation of one's processes in a modelling language like Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) can prove very useful regarding process optimization or automation, employee training and on- and offboarding. Process and task mining frameworks try to ease the creation of process documentation by automatically generating it based on transaction or user interaction data with the system. These approaches often have the disadvantage of not covering the whole process due to a variety of possible execution paths and their habit of not continuously recording process data. We propose an extension to the task mining tool Desktop Activity Mining (DAM) which allows to capture data continuously over several hours and therefore not miss any important cases that might not occur very often. This approach also limits the influence of human errors when recording process data with certain frameworks for documentation purposes and provide the possibility of an improved degree of automation. We evaluate the approach on real-world data to show its feasibility and application in practice. We used a combination of already existing algorithms and created our own. By classifying 332 unique user interactions, we end up with 76 different equivalence classes. Evaluating the algorithm, we achieved a classification correctness of 70% in two datasets.","PeriodicalId":345434,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Advanced Information Science and System","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Advanced Information Science and System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3573834.3574538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thoroughly documenting digital business processes in a company is a crucial and necessary, yet cumbersome task. However, having detailed documentation of one's processes in a modelling language like Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) can prove very useful regarding process optimization or automation, employee training and on- and offboarding. Process and task mining frameworks try to ease the creation of process documentation by automatically generating it based on transaction or user interaction data with the system. These approaches often have the disadvantage of not covering the whole process due to a variety of possible execution paths and their habit of not continuously recording process data. We propose an extension to the task mining tool Desktop Activity Mining (DAM) which allows to capture data continuously over several hours and therefore not miss any important cases that might not occur very often. This approach also limits the influence of human errors when recording process data with certain frameworks for documentation purposes and provide the possibility of an improved degree of automation. We evaluate the approach on real-world data to show its feasibility and application in practice. We used a combination of already existing algorithms and created our own. By classifying 332 unique user interactions, we end up with 76 different equivalence classes. Evaluating the algorithm, we achieved a classification correctness of 70% in two datasets.
从用户交互日志中提取流程实例
彻底记录公司的数字业务流程是一项至关重要、必要但又繁琐的任务。然而,使用业务流程模型和符号(BPMN)等建模语言对流程进行详细的文档记录,对于流程优化或自动化、员工培训以及入职和离职都非常有用。流程和任务挖掘框架试图通过基于与系统的事务或用户交互数据自动生成流程文档来简化流程文档的创建。由于各种可能的执行路径以及它们不连续记录过程数据的习惯,这些方法通常具有不能覆盖整个过程的缺点。我们建议对任务挖掘工具桌面活动挖掘(DAM)进行扩展,它允许在几个小时内连续捕获数据,因此不会错过任何可能不经常发生的重要情况。这种方法还限制了在使用某些框架记录流程数据时人为错误的影响,并提供了提高自动化程度的可能性。我们用实际数据对该方法进行了评估,以证明其可行性和在实践中的应用。我们结合了已有的算法,创造了自己的算法。通过对332个唯一的用户交互进行分类,我们最终得到76个不同的等价类。对算法进行评估,我们在两个数据集上实现了70%的分类正确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信