Performance Analysis of Some Batch Verification Methods of Digital Signatures

D. Guan, E. Zhuang, I. C. Chung, Yu-Shen Lin
{"title":"Performance Analysis of Some Batch Verification Methods of Digital Signatures","authors":"D. Guan, E. Zhuang, I. C. Chung, Yu-Shen Lin","doi":"10.1109/AsiaJCIS.2017.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we compare three methods in detecting invalid signatures in batch verification. The first method, randomly select test, randomly chooses a half of signatures to verify in a batch. The second method is the small exponent test which is widely used. The third method, randomly numbering test, is a simplified method of the matrix-detection algorithm. The randomly numbering test randomizes the order of the signatures and verifies the signatures in log k+1 batches where k is the number of signatures. We simulate each method and analyze the efficiency of the methods. As a result, randomly numbering test is more efficient than small exponent test when the number of signatures in a batch verification is large.","PeriodicalId":108636,"journal":{"name":"2017 12th Asia Joint Conference on Information Security (AsiaJCIS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 12th Asia Joint Conference on Information Security (AsiaJCIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AsiaJCIS.2017.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this paper, we compare three methods in detecting invalid signatures in batch verification. The first method, randomly select test, randomly chooses a half of signatures to verify in a batch. The second method is the small exponent test which is widely used. The third method, randomly numbering test, is a simplified method of the matrix-detection algorithm. The randomly numbering test randomizes the order of the signatures and verifies the signatures in log k+1 batches where k is the number of signatures. We simulate each method and analyze the efficiency of the methods. As a result, randomly numbering test is more efficient than small exponent test when the number of signatures in a batch verification is large.
几种数字签名批量验证方法的性能分析
本文比较了批验证中检测无效签名的三种方法。第一种方法是随机选择测试,随机选择一半的签名进行批量验证。第二种方法是广泛使用的小指数检验。第三种方法是随机编号检验,它是矩阵检测算法的一种简化方法。随机编号测试将签名的顺序随机化,以log k+1批(k为签名个数)为周期进行验证。对每种方法进行了仿真,并对其有效性进行了分析。因此,当批量验证的签名数较大时,随机编号测试比小指数测试效率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信