Specialized Intelligences: A Novel Questionnaire with Subscales for Measuring Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences

A. Salahi, Mohadeseh Aghabarari Gavzani, Sarieh Ebrahimiasl
{"title":"Specialized Intelligences: A Novel Questionnaire with Subscales for Measuring Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences","authors":"A. Salahi, Mohadeseh Aghabarari Gavzani, Sarieh Ebrahimiasl","doi":"10.7459/ites/18.1.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Howard Gardner’s theory argues that intelligence does not adequately encompass the large variety of abilities humans display, as it is traditionally defined. New findings about intelligence that change or expand over a lifetime indicate the need for new assessment methods. This\n study aimed to construct and validate a specialized intelligences questionnaire (SIQ).This was a descriptive and exploratory study. A sample of 304 participants (median age=23) was recruited through non-random and available sampling from Tehran, Iran. Extensive expert opinions were used\n to obtain the content validity of SIQ.The result of assessing content validity was confirmed (I-CVI = 0.857~1.000, S-CVI/UA = 0.819, and S-CVI/Ave = 0.970) and the concurrent validity with Gardner multiple intelligences questionnaire was 0.881. Two methods of Cronbach’s α coefficient\n and halving the test were used to calculate the reliability of the test. The results showed 0.929 for Cronbach’s α, which indicated adequate reliability for the questionnaire. Then the test was halved and Pearson’s correlation coefficient was 0.765 (p=0.000) which suggests\n good correlation for the questionnaire.Our findings indicate that SIQ possesses appropriate validity and reliability to measure the multiple intelligences. This is a valuable tool that can give insights to the future educational planning and decision making for education.","PeriodicalId":139843,"journal":{"name":"Information Technology, Education and Society","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Technology, Education and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7459/ites/18.1.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Howard Gardner’s theory argues that intelligence does not adequately encompass the large variety of abilities humans display, as it is traditionally defined. New findings about intelligence that change or expand over a lifetime indicate the need for new assessment methods. This study aimed to construct and validate a specialized intelligences questionnaire (SIQ).This was a descriptive and exploratory study. A sample of 304 participants (median age=23) was recruited through non-random and available sampling from Tehran, Iran. Extensive expert opinions were used to obtain the content validity of SIQ.The result of assessing content validity was confirmed (I-CVI = 0.857~1.000, S-CVI/UA = 0.819, and S-CVI/Ave = 0.970) and the concurrent validity with Gardner multiple intelligences questionnaire was 0.881. Two methods of Cronbach’s α coefficient and halving the test were used to calculate the reliability of the test. The results showed 0.929 for Cronbach’s α, which indicated adequate reliability for the questionnaire. Then the test was halved and Pearson’s correlation coefficient was 0.765 (p=0.000) which suggests good correlation for the questionnaire.Our findings indicate that SIQ possesses appropriate validity and reliability to measure the multiple intelligences. This is a valuable tool that can give insights to the future educational planning and decision making for education.
专业智力:一种新型的加德纳多元智力量表
霍华德·加德纳的理论认为,智力并没有像传统定义的那样,充分涵盖人类表现出的各种各样的能力。关于智力在一生中变化或扩展的新发现表明需要新的评估方法。本研究旨在建构并验证一份专业智力问卷(SIQ)。这是一项描述性和探索性研究。从伊朗德黑兰通过非随机和可获得的抽样招募了304名参与者(中位年龄=23)。为了获得SIQ的内容效度,我们采用了广泛的专家意见。内容效度评估结果得到证实(I-CVI = 0.857~1.000, S-CVI/UA = 0.819, S-CVI/Ave = 0.970),与Gardner多元智能问卷的并发效度为0.881。采用Cronbach’s α系数法和二分检验法计算检验的信度。结果Cronbach’s α为0.929,表明问卷具有足够的信度。然后将测试减半,Pearson相关系数为0.765 (p=0.000),表明问卷具有良好的相关性。研究结果表明,SIQ具有适当的效度和信度来衡量多元智能。这是一个有价值的工具,可以为未来的教育规划和教育决策提供见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信