A proposal of review extraction method considering the knowledge amount of consumers and the purchase stage

Koichi Horie, M. Onoda, Takeshi Kaneko
{"title":"A proposal of review extraction method considering the knowledge amount of consumers and the purchase stage","authors":"Koichi Horie, M. Onoda, Takeshi Kaneko","doi":"10.17929/TQS.4.83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Today internet shopping sites are widely used. On such sites, consumers cannot take products in their hands, so user reviews of products must be informative for the consumers. However, number of reviews are very large, so consumers cannot read them all. The may miss a very important information which can catch reading all reviews. Purpose of our research is to make a method of indicating only useful reviews for reducing consumer’s burden. We assume that useful reviews are different by consumers. We found that usefulness of reviews differs from consumers’ purpose of browsing review, and also from consumers’ knowledge about purchase target product group. We can classify consumers into six groups. Next we identified factors of useful reviews for each group. Finally we constructed models for evaluating usefulness of each reviews for each group. We made dictionaries for each factor to judge which factors are included in each review. For validating our models, we conducted questionnaires’ survey. Consumers were shown two groups of user reviews, one group contains top 10 useful reviews based on our model, and the other contains original 10 reviews which shopping site shows. We could confirm that our model can show more useful reviews to consumers.","PeriodicalId":301168,"journal":{"name":"Total Quality Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Total Quality Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17929/TQS.4.83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

: Today internet shopping sites are widely used. On such sites, consumers cannot take products in their hands, so user reviews of products must be informative for the consumers. However, number of reviews are very large, so consumers cannot read them all. The may miss a very important information which can catch reading all reviews. Purpose of our research is to make a method of indicating only useful reviews for reducing consumer’s burden. We assume that useful reviews are different by consumers. We found that usefulness of reviews differs from consumers’ purpose of browsing review, and also from consumers’ knowledge about purchase target product group. We can classify consumers into six groups. Next we identified factors of useful reviews for each group. Finally we constructed models for evaluating usefulness of each reviews for each group. We made dictionaries for each factor to judge which factors are included in each review. For validating our models, we conducted questionnaires’ survey. Consumers were shown two groups of user reviews, one group contains top 10 useful reviews based on our model, and the other contains original 10 reviews which shopping site shows. We could confirm that our model can show more useful reviews to consumers.
提出了一种考虑消费者知识量和购买阶段的评论提取方法
今天,网上购物网站被广泛使用。在这样的网站上,消费者不能把产品拿在手里,所以用户对产品的评论必须对消费者有帮助。然而,评论的数量非常大,因此消费者无法阅读所有评论。阅读所有的评论可能会错过一个非常重要的信息。本研究的目的在于提出一种只显示有用评论的方法,以减轻消费者的负担。我们假设有用的评论对消费者来说是不同的。我们发现评论的有用性不同于消费者浏览评论的目的,也不同于消费者对购买目标产品群体的了解。我们可以把消费者分为六类。接下来,我们为每个组确定有用的评论因素。最后,我们为每个组构建了评估每个评论有用性的模型。我们为每个因素制作了词典,以判断每个评论中包含哪些因素。为了验证我们的模型,我们进行了问卷调查。向消费者展示两组用户评论,一组包含基于我们模型的前10条有用评论,另一组包含购物网站显示的原始10条评论。我们可以确认我们的模型可以向消费者展示更多有用的评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书