In Search of Santa Claus: Samuelson, Stigler, and Coase Theorem Worlds

Steven G. Medema
{"title":"In Search of Santa Claus: Samuelson, Stigler, and Coase Theorem Worlds","authors":"Steven G. Medema","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3932616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paul Samuelson was fond of labeling mathematical models with extremely strong and empirically unrealistic assumptions, \"Santa Claus\" economics. But there was one economic result that, in Samuelson’s view, could not be captured even in a Santa Claus world: the Coase theorem, an object of his repeated derision. His friend George Stigler, though, had no such problems and, indeed, was perhaps the biggest cheerleader for the theorem. This paper examines their respective treatments of the Coase theorem in an effort to explain their contrasting positions. In doing so, it suggests that their views on appropriate degrees of abstraction--and perhaps the limits of their theoretical imaginations--were conditioned in part by the results to which that abstraction led.","PeriodicalId":226815,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy & Methodology of Economics eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy & Methodology of Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3932616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Paul Samuelson was fond of labeling mathematical models with extremely strong and empirically unrealistic assumptions, "Santa Claus" economics. But there was one economic result that, in Samuelson’s view, could not be captured even in a Santa Claus world: the Coase theorem, an object of his repeated derision. His friend George Stigler, though, had no such problems and, indeed, was perhaps the biggest cheerleader for the theorem. This paper examines their respective treatments of the Coase theorem in an effort to explain their contrasting positions. In doing so, it suggests that their views on appropriate degrees of abstraction--and perhaps the limits of their theoretical imaginations--were conditioned in part by the results to which that abstraction led.
寻找圣诞老人:萨缪尔森、斯蒂格勒和科斯定理世界
保罗•萨缪尔森(Paul Samuelson)喜欢给数学模型贴上“圣诞老人”经济学(Santa Claus economics)的标签,这些模型带有极其强大且在经验上不切实际的假设。但在萨缪尔森看来,有一个经济学结果,即使在圣诞老人的世界里也无法捕捉到:科斯定理(Coase theorem),这是他一再嘲笑的对象。然而,他的朋友乔治·斯蒂格勒却没有这样的问题,事实上,他可能是这个定理最大的支持者。本文考察了他们各自对科斯定理的处理,试图解释他们截然不同的立场。在这样做的过程中,它表明,他们对适当的抽象程度的看法——也许是他们的理论想象的局限性——在一定程度上受到了抽象所导致的结果的制约。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信