Perception of Differences in Directed Acyclic Graphs: Influence Factors & Cognitive Strategies

Guenter Wallner, M. Pohl, T. V. Landesberger, K. Ballweg
{"title":"Perception of Differences in Directed Acyclic Graphs: Influence Factors & Cognitive Strategies","authors":"Guenter Wallner, M. Pohl, T. V. Landesberger, K. Ballweg","doi":"10.1145/3335082.3335083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Visual comparison of graphs has become widespread in various disciplines. To support this task, it is necessary to generate graph drawings that facilitate the perception of differences. However, while readability of single graphs has been widely investigated, knowledge about the recognition of differences in graphs in general and directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) specifically is quite limited. Towards this end, we conducted an exploratory qualitative study to ascertain which factors influence the perception of changes in DAGs and to better understand the strategies adopted to compare them. Specifically, we investigated pairs of DAGs of varying structure and size (about 50 to 100 nodes) and displayed side-by-side. Based on video recordings and thinking aloud protocols of 22 participants we identified eight factors including edge crossings, shape, symmetry, white space, and density to affect the perception of differences. In addition, we identified three strategies which were used to compare the graphs: layer-by-layer, hierarchical, and a mixture of these two. These strategies were adapted flexibly by the participants based on the graph structure.","PeriodicalId":279162,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","volume":"71 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 31st European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3335082.3335083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Visual comparison of graphs has become widespread in various disciplines. To support this task, it is necessary to generate graph drawings that facilitate the perception of differences. However, while readability of single graphs has been widely investigated, knowledge about the recognition of differences in graphs in general and directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) specifically is quite limited. Towards this end, we conducted an exploratory qualitative study to ascertain which factors influence the perception of changes in DAGs and to better understand the strategies adopted to compare them. Specifically, we investigated pairs of DAGs of varying structure and size (about 50 to 100 nodes) and displayed side-by-side. Based on video recordings and thinking aloud protocols of 22 participants we identified eight factors including edge crossings, shape, symmetry, white space, and density to affect the perception of differences. In addition, we identified three strategies which were used to compare the graphs: layer-by-layer, hierarchical, and a mixture of these two. These strategies were adapted flexibly by the participants based on the graph structure.
有向无环图差异感知:影响因素与认知策略
图形的可视化比较已经在各个学科中广泛应用。为了支持这项任务,有必要生成便于感知差异的图形。然而,尽管对单个图的可读性进行了广泛的研究,但对一般图和有向无环图(dag)之间的差异识别的知识却相当有限。为此,我们进行了一项探索性质的研究,以确定哪些因素影响对dag变化的感知,并更好地了解采用的策略来比较它们。具体来说,我们研究了不同结构和大小(大约50到100个节点)的dag对,并并排显示。根据22名参与者的视频记录和大声思考协议,我们确定了影响差异感知的8个因素,包括边缘交叉、形状、对称性、空白和密度。此外,我们确定了用于比较图表的三种策略:逐层、分层和这两种策略的混合。基于图的结构,参与者可以灵活地适应这些策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信