Pure English: Wharton and the Elect

Abstract

This chapter reads Edith Wharton's writing about race and nation alongside similarly 'ambassadorial' texts by her friend Barrett Wendell. Considering Wharton's French Ways and Their Meaning, 'Amérique en Guerre' and also Backward Glance in light of the antagonism between Wendell and Charles William Eliot, the chapter observes how each thinks about inequality, education, race, and change over time. Liberal, segregationist and eugenicist, Eliot argues for an aristocracy of merit in which the winners will be white; he stands for a liberal, democratic 'Puritan' heritage. Wendell and Wharton affiliate themselves instead with a Dutch, Cavalier tradition that claims whiteness without claiming democracy, and favours warm pleasure over icy rectitude. Sharing nostalgia for an 'Old New England' of Anglo-Saxon purity, they see racial decline where Eliot hails racial development. Less sanguine than Eliot about the possibilities of education, Wharton argues for continuity rather than rapid progress, criticizing 'Puritan' tendencies towards idealism and disruption. To Wendell's students Van Wyck Brooks and Vernon Louis Parrington, Wharton and Wendell alike offer rich source material: a story of decline and extinction, a resistance to 'Puritanism', and a realist critique of idealism. Brooks and Parrington adapt these elements as they develop the narrative about the 'genteel'.