An Exploration of the Influence of 2D Image-Based Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and on-site experiment on Learning Achievement and Technology Acceptance: Based on a Secondary School Chemical Experiment Class

Tiantian Li, A. Tse
{"title":"An Exploration of the Influence of 2D Image-Based Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and on-site experiment on Learning Achievement and Technology Acceptance: Based on a Secondary School Chemical Experiment Class","authors":"Tiantian Li, A. Tse","doi":"10.1145/3502434.3502452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, due to the rapid development of information technology, virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) began appearing as teaching assistance in classroom. While before the technology-assisted classroom, laboratory classes tended to use physical teaching aids and accurate experimental procedures to help students understand the content. In order to explore the differences in learning achievement between on-site chemistry experiments and experiments conducted in AR and VR. Also, to understand the technological acceptance of AR and VR. A pre-test, post-test, and technology acceptance questionnaire is designed. The experiment also use snowball sampling and invited 38 students from Hanzhong City, Shaanxi Province, to participate. A total of 30 available data were collected. A quantitative approach was used to draw relevant conclusions. It was found that the learning achievement of on-site chemistry experiment was the best, the AR group was the second, and the VR group came to the last. In terms of technology acceptance, the AR group showed more positive performance than the VR group. This attitude also positively fed back to the learning achievement of the AR group, and the students in the AR group also had the less psychological burden.","PeriodicalId":114543,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on Education and E-Learning","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on Education and E-Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3502434.3502452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, due to the rapid development of information technology, virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) began appearing as teaching assistance in classroom. While before the technology-assisted classroom, laboratory classes tended to use physical teaching aids and accurate experimental procedures to help students understand the content. In order to explore the differences in learning achievement between on-site chemistry experiments and experiments conducted in AR and VR. Also, to understand the technological acceptance of AR and VR. A pre-test, post-test, and technology acceptance questionnaire is designed. The experiment also use snowball sampling and invited 38 students from Hanzhong City, Shaanxi Province, to participate. A total of 30 available data were collected. A quantitative approach was used to draw relevant conclusions. It was found that the learning achievement of on-site chemistry experiment was the best, the AR group was the second, and the VR group came to the last. In terms of technology acceptance, the AR group showed more positive performance than the VR group. This attitude also positively fed back to the learning achievement of the AR group, and the students in the AR group also had the less psychological burden.
二维图像增强现实、虚拟现实和现场实验对学习成果和技术接受度的影响探讨——以某中学化学实验课为例
近年来,由于信息技术的飞速发展,虚拟现实(VR)和增强现实(AR)作为课堂教学辅助工具开始出现。而在技术辅助课堂之前,实验课倾向于使用物理教具和准确的实验程序来帮助学生理解内容。探讨现场化学实验与AR、VR实验在学习成绩上的差异。同时,了解AR和VR的技术接受度。设计了测试前、测试后和技术接受问卷。实验还采用滚雪球抽样的方式,邀请了来自陕西省汉中市的38名学生参与。共收集了30个可用数据。采用定量方法得出相关结论。结果发现,现场化学实验学习成绩最好,AR组第二,VR组最后。在技术接受度方面,AR组比VR组表现出更积极的表现。这种态度对AR组的学习成绩也有正向反馈,AR组学生的心理负担也较轻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信