Occupational Activism and Racial Desegregation at Work: Activist Careers after the Nonviolent Nashville Civil Rights Movement

D. Cornfield, Jonathan S. Coley, Larry W. Isaac, D. Dickerson
{"title":"Occupational Activism and Racial Desegregation at Work: Activist Careers after the Nonviolent Nashville Civil Rights Movement","authors":"D. Cornfield, Jonathan S. Coley, Larry W. Isaac, D. Dickerson","doi":"10.1108/S0277-283320180000032014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nAs a site of contestation among job seekers, workers, and managers, the bureaucratic workplace both reproduces and erodes occupational race segregation and racial status hierarchies. Much sociological research has examined the reproduction of racial inequality at work; however, little research has examined how desegregationist forces, including civil rights movement values, enter and permeate bureaucratic workplaces into the broader polity. Our purpose in this chapter is to introduce and typologize what we refer to as “occupational activism,” defined as socially transformative individual and collective action that is conducted and realized through an occupational role or occupational community. We empirically induce and present a typology from our study of the half-century-long, post-mobilization occupational careers of over 60 veterans of the nonviolent Nashville civil rights movement of the early 1960s. The fourfold typology of occupational activism is framed in the “new” sociology of work, which emphasizes the role of worker agency and activism in determining worker life chances, and in the “varieties of activism” perspective, which treats the typology as a coherent regime of activist roles in the dialogical diffusion of civil rights movement values into, within, and out of workplaces. We conclude with a research agenda on how bureaucratic workplaces nurture and stymie occupational activism as a racially desegregationist force at work and in the broader polity.","PeriodicalId":422408,"journal":{"name":"Race, Identity and Work","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Race, Identity and Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0277-283320180000032014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Abstract As a site of contestation among job seekers, workers, and managers, the bureaucratic workplace both reproduces and erodes occupational race segregation and racial status hierarchies. Much sociological research has examined the reproduction of racial inequality at work; however, little research has examined how desegregationist forces, including civil rights movement values, enter and permeate bureaucratic workplaces into the broader polity. Our purpose in this chapter is to introduce and typologize what we refer to as “occupational activism,” defined as socially transformative individual and collective action that is conducted and realized through an occupational role or occupational community. We empirically induce and present a typology from our study of the half-century-long, post-mobilization occupational careers of over 60 veterans of the nonviolent Nashville civil rights movement of the early 1960s. The fourfold typology of occupational activism is framed in the “new” sociology of work, which emphasizes the role of worker agency and activism in determining worker life chances, and in the “varieties of activism” perspective, which treats the typology as a coherent regime of activist roles in the dialogical diffusion of civil rights movement values into, within, and out of workplaces. We conclude with a research agenda on how bureaucratic workplaces nurture and stymie occupational activism as a racially desegregationist force at work and in the broader polity.
工作中的职业激进主义和种族隔离:非暴力纳什维尔民权运动后的激进分子职业生涯
作为求职者、工人和管理者之间争论的场所,官僚工作场所再现并侵蚀了职业种族隔离和种族地位等级制度。许多社会学研究考察了工作中种族不平等的再现;然而,很少有研究审查废除种族隔离的力量,包括民权运动的价值观,是如何进入官僚工作场所并渗透到更广泛的政治中去的。我们在本章的目的是介绍和类型化我们所说的“职业行动主义”,定义为通过职业角色或职业社区进行和实现的社会变革的个人和集体行动。我们根据对60年代早期纳什维尔非暴力民权运动的60多名退伍军人长达半个世纪的动员后职业生涯的研究,从经验上归纳并提出了一种类型学。职业行动主义的四种类型是在“新”工作社会学中构建的,它强调工人的能动性和行动主义在决定工人生活机会方面的作用,而在“行动主义的多样性”视角中,它将类型学视为在民权运动价值观进入、内部和外部的对话扩散中活动家角色的一致制度。我们总结了一个研究议程,即官僚工作场所如何培育和阻碍职业激进主义作为一种工作和更广泛的政治中的种族隔离主义力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信