Evaluating Supply Chain Network Designs: An Approach Based on SNA Metrics and Random Forest Feature Selection

Sara Akbar Ghanadian, Saeed Ghanbartehrani
{"title":"Evaluating Supply Chain Network Designs: An Approach Based on SNA Metrics and Random Forest Feature Selection","authors":"Sara Akbar Ghanadian, Saeed Ghanbartehrani","doi":"10.37256/ujom.1120221014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supply chain network design is an important decision-making problem affecting the long-term profitability of firms. Evaluating the performance of supply chain network designs can help decision-makers to select the network configuration that meets the business specifications while operating at a reasonable cost. In this study, Social Network Analysis (SNA) metrics are used to evaluate the performance of closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) Network designs in terms of resilience when exposed to disruptions and the balance of flows. CLSC Networks accommodate the flow of returned products from the customers for recycling, remanufacturing, or disposal, increasing the design complexity compared to traditional supply chain networks. The proposed approach involves custom-designed network-level SNA metrics and random forest (RF) feature selection which are computationally low-cost approaches. The proposed metrics are implemented in an R package titled NetworkSNA and shared on GitHub, and RF feature selection method is performed in python. The optimal and near-optimal network designs from a CLSC Network based on real data are used as a case study. The metric values are interpreted into practical recommendations to compare the alternative CLSC Networks.","PeriodicalId":170563,"journal":{"name":"Universal Journal of Operations and Management","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universal Journal of Operations and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37256/ujom.1120221014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Supply chain network design is an important decision-making problem affecting the long-term profitability of firms. Evaluating the performance of supply chain network designs can help decision-makers to select the network configuration that meets the business specifications while operating at a reasonable cost. In this study, Social Network Analysis (SNA) metrics are used to evaluate the performance of closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) Network designs in terms of resilience when exposed to disruptions and the balance of flows. CLSC Networks accommodate the flow of returned products from the customers for recycling, remanufacturing, or disposal, increasing the design complexity compared to traditional supply chain networks. The proposed approach involves custom-designed network-level SNA metrics and random forest (RF) feature selection which are computationally low-cost approaches. The proposed metrics are implemented in an R package titled NetworkSNA and shared on GitHub, and RF feature selection method is performed in python. The optimal and near-optimal network designs from a CLSC Network based on real data are used as a case study. The metric values are interpreted into practical recommendations to compare the alternative CLSC Networks.
供应链网络设计评价:基于SNA指标和随机森林特征选择的方法
供应链网络设计是影响企业长期盈利能力的重要决策问题。评估供应链网络设计的性能可以帮助决策者选择符合业务规范的网络配置,同时以合理的成本运行。在本研究中,社会网络分析(SNA)指标被用来评估闭环供应链(CLSC)网络设计在面对中断和流量平衡时的弹性方面的表现。CLSC网络适应从客户那里返回的产品流,用于回收、再制造或处理,与传统供应链网络相比,增加了设计的复杂性。所提出的方法包括自定义设计的网络级SNA度量和随机森林(RF)特征选择,这是计算成本低的方法。提出的指标在一个名为NetworkSNA的R包中实现,并在GitHub上共享,RF特征选择方法在python中执行。以实际数据为基础,研究了CLSC网络的最优和近最优网络设计。度量值被解释为实际的建议,以比较可选的CLSC网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信