Implications of Genetically Modified Food Technology Policies for Sub-Saharan Africa

K. Anderson, L. Jackson
{"title":"Implications of Genetically Modified Food Technology Policies for Sub-Saharan Africa","authors":"K. Anderson, L. Jackson","doi":"10.1596/1813-9450-3411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The first generation of genetically modified (GM) crop varieties sought to increase farmer profitability through cost reductions or higher yields. The next generation of GM food research is focusing also on breeding for attributes of interest to consumers, beginning with\"golden rice,\"which has been genetically engineered to contain a higher level of vitamin A and thereby boost the health of unskilled laborers in developing countries. The authors analyze empirically the potential economic effects of adopting both types of innovation in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). They do so using the global economy-wide computable general equilibrium model known as GTAP. The results suggest that the welfare gains are potentially very large, especially from nutritionally enhanced GM wheat and rice, and that-contrary to the claims of numerous interests-those estimated benefits are diminished only slightly by the presence of the European Union's current barriers to imports of GM foods. In particular, if SSA countries impose bans on GM crop imports in an attempt to maintain access to EU markets for non-GM products, the loss to domestic consumers due to that protectionism boost to SSA farmers is far more than the small economic gain for these farmers from greater market access to the EU.","PeriodicalId":168354,"journal":{"name":"Torts & Products Liability Law","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Torts & Products Liability Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-3411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The first generation of genetically modified (GM) crop varieties sought to increase farmer profitability through cost reductions or higher yields. The next generation of GM food research is focusing also on breeding for attributes of interest to consumers, beginning with"golden rice,"which has been genetically engineered to contain a higher level of vitamin A and thereby boost the health of unskilled laborers in developing countries. The authors analyze empirically the potential economic effects of adopting both types of innovation in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). They do so using the global economy-wide computable general equilibrium model known as GTAP. The results suggest that the welfare gains are potentially very large, especially from nutritionally enhanced GM wheat and rice, and that-contrary to the claims of numerous interests-those estimated benefits are diminished only slightly by the presence of the European Union's current barriers to imports of GM foods. In particular, if SSA countries impose bans on GM crop imports in an attempt to maintain access to EU markets for non-GM products, the loss to domestic consumers due to that protectionism boost to SSA farmers is far more than the small economic gain for these farmers from greater market access to the EU.
转基因食品技术政策对撒哈拉以南非洲的影响
第一代转基因作物品种试图通过降低成本或提高产量来增加农民的盈利能力。下一代转基因食品研究也将重点放在培育消费者感兴趣的特性上,从“黄金大米”开始,这种转基因大米含有更高水平的维生素a,从而促进发展中国家不熟练工人的健康。作者实证分析了在撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)采用这两种创新的潜在经济效应。他们使用全球经济范围内的可计算一般均衡模型(GTAP)来计算。结果表明,福利收益可能非常大,特别是来自营养增强的转基因小麦和大米,而且——与众多利益的主张相反——这些估计的利益仅因欧盟目前对转基因食品进口的壁垒而略有减少。特别是,如果SSA国家为了保持非转基因产品进入欧盟市场的机会而对转基因作物进口实施禁令,则由于保护主义对SSA农民的推动而对国内消费者造成的损失远远超过这些农民从更大的欧盟市场准入中获得的微小经济收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信