Cross-Cultural Differences in Discipline

S. Putnam, O. Benga, R. Montirosso, M. Majdandžić, S. Casalin
{"title":"Cross-Cultural Differences in Discipline","authors":"S. Putnam, O. Benga, R. Montirosso, M. Majdandžić, S. Casalin","doi":"10.4324/9781315203713-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Joint Effort Toddler Temperament Consortium (JETTC) cultures differed strongly in use of discipline techniques. Hitting/spanking was used most in Brazil and least in Finland. Shouting was used most by high Long-Term Orientation cultures. Time-out was common in Spain, Belgium, and US, and rare in Finland. Taking away privileges was common in Spain and not in Russia. Requiring children to think about their misbehavior was most common in high Power Distance and Collectivist cultures. Asking the child to repair damage was most common in countries characterized by Short-term Orientation and Indulgence. Talking the issue over was used most in Brazil and Romania, and least in Russia and China.","PeriodicalId":196686,"journal":{"name":"Toddlers, Parents, and Culture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toddlers, Parents, and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315203713-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Joint Effort Toddler Temperament Consortium (JETTC) cultures differed strongly in use of discipline techniques. Hitting/spanking was used most in Brazil and least in Finland. Shouting was used most by high Long-Term Orientation cultures. Time-out was common in Spain, Belgium, and US, and rare in Finland. Taking away privileges was common in Spain and not in Russia. Requiring children to think about their misbehavior was most common in high Power Distance and Collectivist cultures. Asking the child to repair damage was most common in countries characterized by Short-term Orientation and Indulgence. Talking the issue over was used most in Brazil and Romania, and least in Russia and China.
学科的跨文化差异
联合努力幼儿气质联盟(JETTC)文化在使用纪律技术方面存在很大差异。打屁股在巴西使用最多,在芬兰使用最少。在高长期迎新文化中,喊叫是最常用的。暂停在西班牙、比利时和美国很常见,在芬兰很少见。剥夺特权在西班牙很常见,而在俄罗斯却不是。要求孩子思考自己的不当行为在高权力距离和集体主义文化中最为常见。在以短期取向和放纵为特征的国家,要求孩子修复伤害是最常见的。讨论这个问题在巴西和罗马尼亚用得最多,在俄罗斯和中国用得最少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信