[Changes in arterial pressure and heart rate during laryngeal mask insertion in hypertensive patients: comparison with endotracheal intubation].

Y Lee, H H Pan, T T Wei, J C Koh
{"title":"[Changes in arterial pressure and heart rate during laryngeal mask insertion in hypertensive patients: comparison with endotracheal intubation].","authors":"Y Lee,&nbsp;H H Pan,&nbsp;T T Wei,&nbsp;J C Koh","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The pressor response associated with laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation may be harmful to patients with ischemic heart disease, hypertension or cerebrovascular disease. The Brain laryngeal mask airway can be inserted blindly and avoid the need for laryngoscopy. Our preliminary study compared the pressor response of tracheal intubation (T group) with that of laryngeal mask insertion (L group) in 19 and 33 hypertensive patients respectively. We also divided the patients of L group into sub-groups I (n = 16) and II (n = 17). All patients in T group and sub-group I were induced with fentanyl, thiopentone and succinylcholine while in subgroup II patients were induced with the same dosage of thiopentone and succinylcholine without fentanyl. The changes of blood pressure and heart rate exhibited a similar but attenuated pattern of response with laryngeal mask insertion in comparison with tracheal intubation. We also found no significant difference in pressor response between sub-group I and sub-group II in L group. In sum, laryngeal mask insertion may therefore offer some advantages over tracheal intubation in the anesthetic management of hypertensive patients in whom less pressor response is of particular concern.</p>","PeriodicalId":77247,"journal":{"name":"Ma zui xue za zhi = Anaesthesiologica Sinica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ma zui xue za zhi = Anaesthesiologica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pressor response associated with laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation may be harmful to patients with ischemic heart disease, hypertension or cerebrovascular disease. The Brain laryngeal mask airway can be inserted blindly and avoid the need for laryngoscopy. Our preliminary study compared the pressor response of tracheal intubation (T group) with that of laryngeal mask insertion (L group) in 19 and 33 hypertensive patients respectively. We also divided the patients of L group into sub-groups I (n = 16) and II (n = 17). All patients in T group and sub-group I were induced with fentanyl, thiopentone and succinylcholine while in subgroup II patients were induced with the same dosage of thiopentone and succinylcholine without fentanyl. The changes of blood pressure and heart rate exhibited a similar but attenuated pattern of response with laryngeal mask insertion in comparison with tracheal intubation. We also found no significant difference in pressor response between sub-group I and sub-group II in L group. In sum, laryngeal mask insertion may therefore offer some advantages over tracheal intubation in the anesthetic management of hypertensive patients in whom less pressor response is of particular concern.

[高血压患者喉罩置入期间动脉压和心率的变化:与气管插管的比较]。
与喉镜检查和气管插管相关的升压反应可能对缺血性心脏病、高血压或脑血管疾病患者有害。脑喉罩气道可盲目插入,避免喉镜检查。我们初步比较了19例和33例高血压患者气管插管(T组)和喉罩插入(L组)的升压反应。将L组患者分为I组(n = 16)和II组(n = 17)。T组和I亚组均采用芬太尼、硫喷妥酮和琥珀胆碱诱导,II亚组采用相同剂量的硫喷妥酮和琥珀胆碱诱导,不使用芬太尼。与气管插管相比,插入喉罩后血压和心率的变化表现出相似但减弱的反应模式。我们还发现L组I亚组和II亚组的降压反应无显著差异。综上所述,在高血压患者的麻醉管理中,喉罩插入可能比气管插管有一些优势,而高血压患者的降压反应更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信