Don’T Tax Capital €” Optimal Ramsey Taxation in Heterogeneous Agent Economies with Quasi-Linear Preferences

YiLi Chien, Y. Wen
{"title":"Don’T Tax Capital €” Optimal Ramsey Taxation in Heterogeneous Agent Economies with Quasi-Linear Preferences","authors":"YiLi Chien, Y. Wen","doi":"10.20955/wp.2019.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We build a tractable infinite-horizon Aiyagari-type model with quasi-linear preferences to address a set of long-standing issues in the optimal Ramsey taxation literature. The tractability of our model enables us to analytically establish several strong and novel results: (i) The optimal capital tax is exclusively zero in a Ramsey steady state regardless of the modified golden rule and government debt limits. (ii) Along the transition path toward a Ramsey steady state, optimal capital tax depends positively on the elasticity of intertemporal substitution. (iii) When a Ramsey steady state (featuring a non-binding government debt limit) does not exist but is erroneously assumed to exist, the modified golden rule always \"holds\" and the implied \"optimal\" long-run capital tax is strictly positive, reminiscent of the result obtained by Aiyagari (1995). (iv) Whether the modified golden rule holds depends critically on the government's capacity to issue debts, but has no bearing on the planner's long-run capital tax scheme. (v) The optimal debt-to-GDP ratio in the absence of a binding debt limit, however, is determined by a positive wedge times the modified-golden-rule saving rate; the wedge is decreasing in the strength of the individual self-insurance position and approaches zero when the idiosyncratic risk vanishes or markets are complete. The key insight behind our results is the Ramsey planner's ultimate concern for self-insurance. Since taxing capital in the steady state permanently hinders individuals' self-insurance positions, the Ramsey planner prefers (i) taxing capital only in the short run and (ii) issuing debt rather than imposing a steady-state capital tax to correct the capital-overaccumulation problem under precautionary saving motives. Thus, in sharp contrast to Aiyagari's argument, permanent capital taxation is not the optimal tool to achieve aggregate allocative efficiency despite overaccumulation of capital, and the modified golden rule can fail to hold in a Ramsey equilibrium whenever the government encounters a debt-limit.","PeriodicalId":123778,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Theoretical Dynamic Models (Topic)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Theoretical Dynamic Models (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20955/wp.2019.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

We build a tractable infinite-horizon Aiyagari-type model with quasi-linear preferences to address a set of long-standing issues in the optimal Ramsey taxation literature. The tractability of our model enables us to analytically establish several strong and novel results: (i) The optimal capital tax is exclusively zero in a Ramsey steady state regardless of the modified golden rule and government debt limits. (ii) Along the transition path toward a Ramsey steady state, optimal capital tax depends positively on the elasticity of intertemporal substitution. (iii) When a Ramsey steady state (featuring a non-binding government debt limit) does not exist but is erroneously assumed to exist, the modified golden rule always "holds" and the implied "optimal" long-run capital tax is strictly positive, reminiscent of the result obtained by Aiyagari (1995). (iv) Whether the modified golden rule holds depends critically on the government's capacity to issue debts, but has no bearing on the planner's long-run capital tax scheme. (v) The optimal debt-to-GDP ratio in the absence of a binding debt limit, however, is determined by a positive wedge times the modified-golden-rule saving rate; the wedge is decreasing in the strength of the individual self-insurance position and approaches zero when the idiosyncratic risk vanishes or markets are complete. The key insight behind our results is the Ramsey planner's ultimate concern for self-insurance. Since taxing capital in the steady state permanently hinders individuals' self-insurance positions, the Ramsey planner prefers (i) taxing capital only in the short run and (ii) issuing debt rather than imposing a steady-state capital tax to correct the capital-overaccumulation problem under precautionary saving motives. Thus, in sharp contrast to Aiyagari's argument, permanent capital taxation is not the optimal tool to achieve aggregate allocative efficiency despite overaccumulation of capital, and the modified golden rule can fail to hold in a Ramsey equilibrium whenever the government encounters a debt-limit.
don -™T税收资本Â -具有准线性偏好的异质代理经济中的最优拉姆齐税收
我们建立了一个可处理的具有准线性偏好的无限视界aiyagari型模型,以解决最优拉姆齐税收文献中一系列长期存在的问题。我们模型的可追溯性使我们能够分析地建立几个强有力的和新颖的结果:(i)在拉姆齐稳定状态下,无论修改的黄金法则和政府债务上限如何,最优资本税都是零。(2)在向拉姆齐稳态过渡的路径上,最优资本税与跨期替代弹性呈正相关。(iii)当拉姆齐稳态(以不具约束力的政府债务上限为特征)不存在但被错误地假设存在时,修正的黄金法则总是“成立”,隐含的“最优”长期资本税是严格正的,这让人想起Aiyagari(1995)得到的结果。(iv)修改后的黄金法则是否成立,关键取决于政府发行债务的能力,但与计划者的长期资本税方案无关。然而,在没有约束性债务限额的情况下,最佳的债务与国内总产值比率由正楔形乘以经修正的黄金法则储蓄率决定;当特殊风险消失或市场完备时,个人自我保险头寸的强度逐渐减小,接近于零。我们的研究结果背后的关键洞见是这位拉姆齐规划师对自我保险的终极关注。由于在稳定状态下对资本征税永久地阻碍了个人的自我保险头寸,拉姆齐计划者倾向于(i)只在短期内对资本征税,(ii)发行债券,而不是征收稳定状态下的资本税,以纠正预防性储蓄动机下的资本过度积累问题。因此,与Aiyagari的观点形成强烈对比的是,尽管存在资本过度积累,但永久资本税并不是实现总配置效率的最佳工具,而且当政府遇到债务上限时,修改后的黄金法则可能无法维持拉姆齐均衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信