The Effect of Work Ethics and Work Environment on Employee Performance At The Jakarta Primary Tax Service Gambir Tiga

Munir Azhari, Harries Madiistriyatno, Sukar Naibaho
{"title":"The Effect of Work Ethics and Work Environment on Employee Performance At The Jakarta Primary Tax Service Gambir Tiga","authors":"Munir Azhari, Harries Madiistriyatno, Sukar Naibaho","doi":"10.57096/return.v2i03.85","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is quantitative, descriptive, and associative type. The population in this study was 70 employees at the Gambir Tiga Jakarta Primary Tax Service Office. The sampling technique in this study is total sampling. With the total sampling technique, a sample of 70 employees was taken at the Gambir Tiga Jakarta Primary Tax Service Office as respondents in this study. The results of this study indicate that: 1) There is an influence of work ethic on employee performance, as evidenced by the count for the X1 variable (Work Ethic) of 13,491, while the value of the t table for n = 70 is 1,994. So t arithmetic> table or  13,491> 1,994, it can be concluded that the  Work  Ethic variable influences partially the Job Performance of Employees. The coefficient regression value of the. The work ethic variable (X1) to the Employee Job Performance variable (Y) is 0.405. This means that if the Work Ethics variable (X1) rises by 1 unit it will increase the. Employee Job Performance (Y) variable by 0.405, assuming the Work Ethics variable (X1) is considered constant. 2) There is an influence of the work environment on employee work performance, as evidenced by the count for the X2 variable (Work Environment) of 16,862, while the value of the table for n = 70 is 1,994. So tcount>table or 16,862>1,994, it can be concluded that partial  Work  Environment variables affect Employee Work Performance. The value of the regression coefficient of the Work Environment variable (X2) to the Employee Job Performance variable (Y) is 0.605. This means that if the Work Environment variable (X2) increases by 1 unit, it will increase the Employee Job Performance (Y) variable by 0.605, assuming the Work Environment variable (X2) is considered constant. 3) There is an influence of work ethic and work environment together on employee work performance, as evidenced by the ANOVA or Ftest or Fcount test in the value of 302,319 which is greater than Ftable of 2.74 with a significant level of 0,000 because 0,000 <0.05, so it can be said that the Work Ethics variable (X1) and Work Environment variable (X2) together influence the Employee Performance variable (Y). While the Adjusted R. Square value of 0.900. This shows that 90% of the work ethic and work environment simultaneously (jointly) affect employee work performance, while the remaining 10% is influenced by other factors not examined in this study.","PeriodicalId":402323,"journal":{"name":"Return : Study of Management, Economic and Bussines","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Return : Study of Management, Economic and Bussines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57096/return.v2i03.85","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This research is quantitative, descriptive, and associative type. The population in this study was 70 employees at the Gambir Tiga Jakarta Primary Tax Service Office. The sampling technique in this study is total sampling. With the total sampling technique, a sample of 70 employees was taken at the Gambir Tiga Jakarta Primary Tax Service Office as respondents in this study. The results of this study indicate that: 1) There is an influence of work ethic on employee performance, as evidenced by the count for the X1 variable (Work Ethic) of 13,491, while the value of the t table for n = 70 is 1,994. So t arithmetic> table or  13,491> 1,994, it can be concluded that the  Work  Ethic variable influences partially the Job Performance of Employees. The coefficient regression value of the. The work ethic variable (X1) to the Employee Job Performance variable (Y) is 0.405. This means that if the Work Ethics variable (X1) rises by 1 unit it will increase the. Employee Job Performance (Y) variable by 0.405, assuming the Work Ethics variable (X1) is considered constant. 2) There is an influence of the work environment on employee work performance, as evidenced by the count for the X2 variable (Work Environment) of 16,862, while the value of the table for n = 70 is 1,994. So tcount>table or 16,862>1,994, it can be concluded that partial  Work  Environment variables affect Employee Work Performance. The value of the regression coefficient of the Work Environment variable (X2) to the Employee Job Performance variable (Y) is 0.605. This means that if the Work Environment variable (X2) increases by 1 unit, it will increase the Employee Job Performance (Y) variable by 0.605, assuming the Work Environment variable (X2) is considered constant. 3) There is an influence of work ethic and work environment together on employee work performance, as evidenced by the ANOVA or Ftest or Fcount test in the value of 302,319 which is greater than Ftable of 2.74 with a significant level of 0,000 because 0,000 <0.05, so it can be said that the Work Ethics variable (X1) and Work Environment variable (X2) together influence the Employee Performance variable (Y). While the Adjusted R. Square value of 0.900. This shows that 90% of the work ethic and work environment simultaneously (jointly) affect employee work performance, while the remaining 10% is influenced by other factors not examined in this study.
雅加达初级税务服务机构的职业道德和工作环境对员工绩效的影响
本研究为定量、描述性、联想型研究。这项研究的对象是Gambir Tiga Jakarta Primary Tax Service Office的70名雇员。本研究的抽样方法为全抽样。采用总抽样技术,本研究选取了甘比尔提加雅加达初级税务服务办公室的70名员工作为调查对象。本研究结果表明:1)职业道德对员工绩效有影响,X1变量(职业道德)的计数为13491,而n = 70时t表的值为1994。因此,t算术>表或13491 > 1994,可以得出结论,职业道德变量部分影响员工的工作绩效。的系数回归值。工作伦理变量(X1)对员工工作绩效变量(Y)的影响为0.405。这意味着如果职业道德变量(X1)增加1个单位,它将增加。假设工作道德变量(X1)不变,员工工作绩效(Y)变量为0.405。2)工作环境对员工工作绩效有影响,X2变量(工作环境)的计数为16,862,而n = 70的表的值为1,994。因此tcount>表或16,862> 1994,可以得出部分工作环境变量影响员工工作绩效的结论。工作环境变量(X2)对员工工作绩效变量(Y)的回归系数为0.605。这意味着,如果工作环境变量(X2)增加1个单位,假设工作环境变量(X2)不变,则员工工作绩效(Y)变量将增加0.605。3)职业道德和工作环境共同对员工工作绩效有影响,方差分析或Fcount检验的值为302,319,由于0,000 <0.05,其显著性水平为0,000,高于Ftable(2.74),因此可以说职业道德变量(X1)和工作环境变量(X2)共同影响员工绩效变量(Y),而调整后的r平方值为0.900。这表明,90%的职业道德和工作环境同时(共同)影响员工的工作绩效,而剩余的10%是由本研究未研究的其他因素影响的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信