Dwikarunia Setiawan Guntik, Dewa Gede Pradnya Yustiawan
{"title":"CORPORATIONS AS WHISTLEBLOWERS IN THE CRIME OF DEFAMATION BASED ON THE ELECTRONIC AND TRANSACTION INFORMATION ACT","authors":"Dwikarunia Setiawan Guntik, Dewa Gede Pradnya Yustiawan","doi":"10.55047/polri.v1i1.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of writing this article is to find out whether the corporation can be a reporting party in the criminal act of defamation under the ITE Law. The methods performed in writing this article are normative legal research methods that use a type of statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study showed that the regulation of defamation crimes stipulated in the Criminal Code and ITE Law, corporations cannot be the reporting party in the criminal act of defamation under the ITE Law because based on letter a guidelines for the implementation of Article 27 Paragraph (3) of SkB No. 2/VI/2021 on guidelines for the implementation of the ITE Law stipulate that the understanding of the content of insults and / or defamation must refer to the provisions of Article 310 and 311 of the Criminal Code in addition to letter f The implementation guidelines of Article 27 Paragraph (3) of the ITE Law stipulates that victims who can become whistleblowers are only individuals with a specific identity so that corporations cannot be reporting parties under the ITE Law. Corporations cannot be the reporting party should be included in the article explanation to be binding in an arrangement because the nature of the DECREE containing implementation guidelines is only binding on law enforcement only. \n \n ","PeriodicalId":434803,"journal":{"name":"POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)","volume":"124 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v1i1.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The purpose of writing this article is to find out whether the corporation can be a reporting party in the criminal act of defamation under the ITE Law. The methods performed in writing this article are normative legal research methods that use a type of statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study showed that the regulation of defamation crimes stipulated in the Criminal Code and ITE Law, corporations cannot be the reporting party in the criminal act of defamation under the ITE Law because based on letter a guidelines for the implementation of Article 27 Paragraph (3) of SkB No. 2/VI/2021 on guidelines for the implementation of the ITE Law stipulate that the understanding of the content of insults and / or defamation must refer to the provisions of Article 310 and 311 of the Criminal Code in addition to letter f The implementation guidelines of Article 27 Paragraph (3) of the ITE Law stipulates that victims who can become whistleblowers are only individuals with a specific identity so that corporations cannot be reporting parties under the ITE Law. Corporations cannot be the reporting party should be included in the article explanation to be binding in an arrangement because the nature of the DECREE containing implementation guidelines is only binding on law enforcement only.
写这篇文章的目的是为了了解公司是否可以在诽谤犯罪行为中成为举报方。在撰写这篇文章的方法是规范性的法律研究方法,使用一种法定方法和概念方法。研究结果表明,刑法和信息技术法对诽谤犯罪的规制;企业不能报道党诽谤,尽管法律规定的犯罪行为,因为基于信指导方针的实施SkB第二十七条(3)款2号/ VI / 2021指南的实施尽管法律规定的理解侮辱或诽谤的内容必须是指本法第310条和311年的刑法除了字母f的实施细则尽管第二十七条(3)款法律规定,只有具有特定身份的个人才能成为举报人,因此企业不能成为举报对象。公司不能是报告方,应在条款解释中列入对一项安排具有约束力的条款,因为载有执行准则的法令的性质只对执法具有约束力。