Evaluation of the applicability of Light’s criteria for differentiation of transudates from exudates across different serous fluids

A. Imran, Sadaf Farzand
{"title":"Evaluation of the applicability of Light’s criteria for differentiation of transudates from exudates across different serous fluids","authors":"A. Imran, Sadaf Farzand","doi":"10.55958/jcvd.v18i1.94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Serous fluids like pericardial, pleural and ascitic fluids are frequently submitted for pathological evaluation. The differentiation of these fluids into transudates and exudates is the prime aim of the evaluation as this determines the patients’ further management. Light’s criteria, proposed about 50 years ago, utilize various biochemical parameters for this differentiation and are the most widely used criteria. \nMaterials and Methods: This study was carried-out in Pathology department of Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore. 60 serous fluid samples, including pericardial, pleural and ascitic fluids were analyzed routinely and classified into transudates and exudates applying Light’s criteria. The proportion of transudates and exudates were compared amongst different fluids by applying chi-square test, keeping level of significance at p-value <0.05. Cytological examination was reported according to the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology. \nResults: Most of the fluids, i.e., 44 out of 60 were exudates. This trend was most pronounced for pericardial fluids where 29 out of 31 were exudates. 13 pleural fluids out of 23 were exudative while only 2 out of 6 ascitic fluids were exudative. On cytological examination, 55 fluids were negative for malignant cells, 2 fluids harbored atypical cells and 3 were positive for malignant cells. Careful gross examination of fluids furnished vital information in many cases. \nConclusion: Light’s criteria may not be equally applicable across all types of fluids. In our study it had a high sensitivity but low specificity for pericardial exudates. Hence, modification of the criteria may be required to enhance its validity. Careful gross and cytological examination may provide additional invaluable information that could significantly impact management strategies. \nKeywords:  Pleural fluid, pericardial fluid, light’s criteria, transudate, exudate.","PeriodicalId":227176,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55958/jcvd.v18i1.94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Serous fluids like pericardial, pleural and ascitic fluids are frequently submitted for pathological evaluation. The differentiation of these fluids into transudates and exudates is the prime aim of the evaluation as this determines the patients’ further management. Light’s criteria, proposed about 50 years ago, utilize various biochemical parameters for this differentiation and are the most widely used criteria. Materials and Methods: This study was carried-out in Pathology department of Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Lahore. 60 serous fluid samples, including pericardial, pleural and ascitic fluids were analyzed routinely and classified into transudates and exudates applying Light’s criteria. The proportion of transudates and exudates were compared amongst different fluids by applying chi-square test, keeping level of significance at p-value <0.05. Cytological examination was reported according to the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology. Results: Most of the fluids, i.e., 44 out of 60 were exudates. This trend was most pronounced for pericardial fluids where 29 out of 31 were exudates. 13 pleural fluids out of 23 were exudative while only 2 out of 6 ascitic fluids were exudative. On cytological examination, 55 fluids were negative for malignant cells, 2 fluids harbored atypical cells and 3 were positive for malignant cells. Careful gross examination of fluids furnished vital information in many cases. Conclusion: Light’s criteria may not be equally applicable across all types of fluids. In our study it had a high sensitivity but low specificity for pericardial exudates. Hence, modification of the criteria may be required to enhance its validity. Careful gross and cytological examination may provide additional invaluable information that could significantly impact management strategies. Keywords:  Pleural fluid, pericardial fluid, light’s criteria, transudate, exudate.
Light标准对不同浆液中渗出液和渗出液鉴别的适用性评价
背景:浆液如心包、胸膜和腹水经常被提交病理评估。将这些液体区分为渗出液和渗出液是评估的主要目的,因为这决定了患者的进一步治疗。约50年前提出的Light标准利用各种生化参数进行这种区分,是最广泛使用的标准。材料与方法:本研究在拉合尔旁遮普心脏病研究所病理科室进行,对60例浆液标本进行常规分析,包括心包液、胸膜液和腹水,并应用Light标准将其分类为渗出液和渗出液。采用卡方检验比较不同体液中渗出液和渗出液的比例,p值<0.05。细胞学检查按照国际浆液细胞病理学报告系统报告。结果:60例中有44例为渗出液。这一趋势在心包液中最为明显,31例中有29例为渗出液。23例中有13例胸腔积液渗出,6例腹水中只有2例渗出。细胞学检查,恶性细胞阴性55例,非典型细胞2例,恶性细胞阳性3例。在许多情况下,对液体的仔细大体检查提供了重要的信息。结论:光的标准可能并不适用于所有类型的流体。在我们的研究中,它对心包渗出物具有高敏感性但低特异性。因此,可能需要修改标准以提高其有效性。仔细的大体检查和细胞学检查可以提供额外的宝贵信息,可以显著影响管理策略。关键词:胸腔积液,心包积液,光标,渗出,渗出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信