A comprehensive study of hardware/software approaches to improve TLB performance for java applications on embedded systems

Jinzhan Peng, Guei-Yuan Lueh, Gansha Wu, Xiaogang Gou, R. Rakvic
{"title":"A comprehensive study of hardware/software approaches to improve TLB performance for java applications on embedded systems","authors":"Jinzhan Peng, Guei-Yuan Lueh, Gansha Wu, Xiaogang Gou, R. Rakvic","doi":"10.1145/1178597.1178614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The working set size of Java applications on embedded systems has recently been increasing, causing the Translation Lookaside Buffer (TLB) to become a serious performance bottleneck. From a thorough analysis of the SPECjvm98 benchmark suite executing on a commodity embedded system, we find TLB misses attribute from 24% to 50% of the total execution time. We explore and evaluate a wide spectrum of TLB-enhancing techniques with different combinations of software/hardware approaches, namely superpage for reducing TLB miss rates, two-level TLB and TLB prefetching for reducing both TLB miss rates and TLB miss latency, and even a no-TLB design for removing TLB overhead completely. We adapt and then in a novel way extend these approaches to fit the design space of embedded systems executing Java code. We compare these approaches, discussing their performance behavior, software/hardware complexity and constraints, especially the design implications for the application, runtime and OS.We first conclude that even with the aggressive approaches presented, there remains a performance bottleneck with the TLB. Second, in addition to facing very different design considerations and constraints for embedded systems, proven hardware techniques, such as TLB prefetching have different performance implications. Third, software based solutions, no-TLB design and superpaging, appear to be more effective in improving Java application performance on embedded systems. Finally, beyond performance, these approaches have their respective pros and cons; it is left to the system designer to make the appropriate engineering tradeoff.","PeriodicalId":130040,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Memory System Performance and Correctness","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Memory System Performance and Correctness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1178597.1178614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The working set size of Java applications on embedded systems has recently been increasing, causing the Translation Lookaside Buffer (TLB) to become a serious performance bottleneck. From a thorough analysis of the SPECjvm98 benchmark suite executing on a commodity embedded system, we find TLB misses attribute from 24% to 50% of the total execution time. We explore and evaluate a wide spectrum of TLB-enhancing techniques with different combinations of software/hardware approaches, namely superpage for reducing TLB miss rates, two-level TLB and TLB prefetching for reducing both TLB miss rates and TLB miss latency, and even a no-TLB design for removing TLB overhead completely. We adapt and then in a novel way extend these approaches to fit the design space of embedded systems executing Java code. We compare these approaches, discussing their performance behavior, software/hardware complexity and constraints, especially the design implications for the application, runtime and OS.We first conclude that even with the aggressive approaches presented, there remains a performance bottleneck with the TLB. Second, in addition to facing very different design considerations and constraints for embedded systems, proven hardware techniques, such as TLB prefetching have different performance implications. Third, software based solutions, no-TLB design and superpaging, appear to be more effective in improving Java application performance on embedded systems. Finally, beyond performance, these approaches have their respective pros and cons; it is left to the system designer to make the appropriate engineering tradeoff.
对提高嵌入式系统上java应用程序的TLB性能的硬件/软件方法的综合研究
嵌入式系统上Java应用程序的工作集大小最近一直在增加,这导致翻译暂置缓冲区(Translation Lookaside Buffer, TLB)成为严重的性能瓶颈。通过对在商用嵌入式系统上执行的SPECjvm98基准测试套件的彻底分析,我们发现TLB缺失属性占总执行时间的24%到50%。我们通过不同的软件/硬件方法组合探索和评估了广泛的TLB增强技术,即减少TLB缺失率的超页,减少TLB缺失率和TLB延迟的两级TLB和TLB预取,甚至是完全消除TLB开销的无TLB设计。我们调整并以一种新颖的方式扩展这些方法,以适应执行Java代码的嵌入式系统的设计空间。我们比较了这些方法,讨论了它们的性能行为、软件/硬件复杂性和约束,特别是对应用程序、运行时和操作系统的设计含义。我们首先得出的结论是,即使采用了积极的方法,TLB仍然存在性能瓶颈。其次,除了面对嵌入式系统非常不同的设计考虑和约束外,经过验证的硬件技术(如TLB预取)具有不同的性能含义。第三,基于软件的解决方案(无tlb设计和超级分页)似乎在提高嵌入式系统上的Java应用程序性能方面更有效。最后,除了性能之外,这些方法也有各自的优缺点;这是留给系统设计师做出适当的工程权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信