Pure Heart: The Faith of a Father and Son in the War for a More Perfect Union by William F. Quigley, Jr. (review)

T. Orr
{"title":"Pure Heart: The Faith of a Father and Son in the War for a More Perfect Union by William F. Quigley, Jr. (review)","authors":"T. Orr","doi":"10.1353/get.2018.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Book Notes will not likely understand the complexities of artillery deployment and terminology. For instance, Shultz repeatedly referred to the prolong, the long rope that allowed gunners to connect their piece to the limber without hitching it. When he fi rst introduced the prolong, Shultz did not specify what it was. Occasionally, the author assumes his readers already possess an advanced understanding of Civil War terminology and tactics. Consequently, this book could be a hard sell for readers who are just beginning to learn about the battle. Also, the author makes a claim that requires more explanation. On page 30, Shultz writes, “By and large, Union gunners were also better artillerists than their Southern counterparts.” Without any examples or explanations, Shultz lets that generalization hang there awkwardly. I wouldn’t necessarily disagree with him, but a deeper analysis of Confederate shortcomings would have been a helpful addition. In any case, Double Canister at Ten Yards is a good overview of the importance of Union artillery during this chaotic phase of the battle, and it should be read by anyone who wants to study Longstreet’s Assault. Should the author want to turn his eye toward the Union artillery’s counterpart— the lessdecisive role of the Confederate artillery during the bombardment— I’ll bet readers would be just as interested in it. Bert Dunkerly Richmond National Battlefi eld Park","PeriodicalId":268075,"journal":{"name":"Gettysburg Magazine","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gettysburg Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/get.2018.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Book Notes will not likely understand the complexities of artillery deployment and terminology. For instance, Shultz repeatedly referred to the prolong, the long rope that allowed gunners to connect their piece to the limber without hitching it. When he fi rst introduced the prolong, Shultz did not specify what it was. Occasionally, the author assumes his readers already possess an advanced understanding of Civil War terminology and tactics. Consequently, this book could be a hard sell for readers who are just beginning to learn about the battle. Also, the author makes a claim that requires more explanation. On page 30, Shultz writes, “By and large, Union gunners were also better artillerists than their Southern counterparts.” Without any examples or explanations, Shultz lets that generalization hang there awkwardly. I wouldn’t necessarily disagree with him, but a deeper analysis of Confederate shortcomings would have been a helpful addition. In any case, Double Canister at Ten Yards is a good overview of the importance of Union artillery during this chaotic phase of the battle, and it should be read by anyone who wants to study Longstreet’s Assault. Should the author want to turn his eye toward the Union artillery’s counterpart— the lessdecisive role of the Confederate artillery during the bombardment— I’ll bet readers would be just as interested in it. Bert Dunkerly Richmond National Battlefi eld Park
书本笔记不太可能理解炮兵部署和术语的复杂性。例如,舒尔茨反复提到了延长线,即允许枪手将他们的枪连接到韧体上而不系住它的长绳。当他第一次提出延长时,舒尔茨并没有具体说明是什么。偶尔,作者假设他的读者已经对内战的术语和战术有了深入的了解。因此,对于刚刚开始了解这场战争的读者来说,这本书可能很难卖出去。此外,作者提出了一个需要更多解释的主张。在第30页,舒尔茨写道:“总的来说,北方的炮兵也比南方的同行更擅长炮兵。”在没有任何例子或解释的情况下,舒尔茨笨拙地让这种概括停留在那里。我不一定不同意他的观点,但对南方联盟的缺点进行更深入的分析将是一个有益的补充。无论如何,《十码双炮》很好地概括了联邦炮兵在这一混乱的战斗阶段的重要性,任何想要研究朗斯特里特突击的人都应该读一读。如果作者想把目光转向联邦炮兵的对手——南方炮兵在轰炸中所起的不那么决定性的作用——我敢打赌读者也会对此感兴趣。伯特·邓克利里士满国家战场公园
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信