Tugçe Ayraç, Anıl Özdemirli, Emre Apaydin, Kemal Ozanoglu, M. Yazgi
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Multiline TRL and 2X-Thru De-Embedding Implementation Methods on Printed Circuit Board Measurements","authors":"Tugçe Ayraç, Anıl Özdemirli, Emre Apaydin, Kemal Ozanoglu, M. Yazgi","doi":"10.1109/SMACD58065.2023.10192140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work presents a comprehensive study of two different de-embedding techniques: the Multiline method and the 2X-Thru fixture removal. The methods are compared in terms of calibration standard requirements, de-embedding methodology, fixture removing accuracy, and de-embedding results. The comparison reveals that the accuracy of the Multiline method strictly depends on the impedance variation between calibration standards. The 2X-Thru with impedance correction, on the other hand, is more prone to impedance variation since it relies on a single calibration standard, which also eases the measurement routine and reduces the complexity. One important aim of this study is to contribute to the development of open-source de-embedding tools since the validity and accuracy of commercial tools cannot be evaluated for academic purposes.","PeriodicalId":239306,"journal":{"name":"2023 19th International Conference on Synthesis, Modeling, Analysis and Simulation Methods and Applications to Circuit Design (SMACD)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 19th International Conference on Synthesis, Modeling, Analysis and Simulation Methods and Applications to Circuit Design (SMACD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SMACD58065.2023.10192140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This work presents a comprehensive study of two different de-embedding techniques: the Multiline method and the 2X-Thru fixture removal. The methods are compared in terms of calibration standard requirements, de-embedding methodology, fixture removing accuracy, and de-embedding results. The comparison reveals that the accuracy of the Multiline method strictly depends on the impedance variation between calibration standards. The 2X-Thru with impedance correction, on the other hand, is more prone to impedance variation since it relies on a single calibration standard, which also eases the measurement routine and reduces the complexity. One important aim of this study is to contribute to the development of open-source de-embedding tools since the validity and accuracy of commercial tools cannot be evaluated for academic purposes.