Geochemical Atlas of Oils and Source Rocks and Oil-Source Rock Correlations: A Case Study of Oil and Ggas Fields in the Mangyshlak Basin (Kazakhstan)

Y. Seitkhaziyev, N. Sarsenbekov, R. Uteyev
{"title":"Geochemical Atlas of Oils and Source Rocks and Oil-Source Rock Correlations: A Case Study of Oil and Ggas Fields in the Mangyshlak Basin (Kazakhstan)","authors":"Y. Seitkhaziyev, N. Sarsenbekov, R. Uteyev","doi":"10.2118/212078-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents the results of fingerprinting and biomarker analysis of 183 crude oil samples derived from 19 oil and gas fields in the South Mangyshlak basin and Rock -Eval pyrolysis performed on 93 core samples from 12 fields of this basin.\n Geochemical atlas was made based on the oil fingerprinting studies, according to which, the studied fields of the South- Mangyshlak basin can be divided into 3 groups:\n same type of oils on the scale of groups of fields. This group includes Permian-Triassic oils of the Karaginskaya Saddle (Northern Karagiye, Atambay, Alatyube, Ashchiagar) and the Peschannomyssko-Rakushechnaya uplift zone (Oymasha), which have very similar oil fingerprinting either within each field or on the scale of these fields. oils of the same type within the same field. The second group includes oils from Pridorozhnoye, Airantakyr, Burmasha and Bekturly fields, each of which has its own unique oil fingerprinting of light aromatic hydrocarbons. different types of oils within the same field. This group includes oils from the rest of the studied Zhetybay- Uzen steps such as Asar, East Zhetybay, South Zhetybay, Aktas, Turkmenoy, Tasbulat, Uzen and Karamandybas fields, since within each of these fields were identified several different groups of oils that require a detailed study of their biomarkers to determine their genetic origin and trace hydrocarbon migration pathways.\n The obtained results of oil fingerprinting are consistent with their biomarker compositions, according to which the oils of the first group, identified by their fingerprinting, were generated from marine shaly source rocks, while those of the second group were from shaly source rocks, deposited in whether marine or lacustrine environments. The biomarker composition of the third group oils exhibited that the oils within each of these fields have at least two genetic sources: the oils of the lower pay zones have shaly marine OM source, while those of the upper upper pay zones were formed by OM deposited in lacustrine environment. Their biomarkers clearly show a regular change in the contribution of lacustrine OM input to marine one with the depth increase of pay zones and within the field of this group thermally more mature oils of a marine source (23-24 horizons Uzen and Karamandybas, J-10 and J-11 fields of Asar, Zhetybay, Zhetybay East) were mixed with relatively lower mature oils of the upper lacustrine source (13-16 th pay zones in Uzen and Karamandybas, J-J-3a, J-4a in Asar field, J-5 in Zhetybay, J-1 in Zhetybay East) with their upward migration.\n To characterize source rocks, where the studied oils were generated, Rock-Eval pyrolysis was performed on core samples of different ages, which revealed that in reality the reservoirs of the Asar, Zhetybay, Karamandybas, Uzen and Akkar fields can be considered synclinal, that means, it serves as both reservoir and source rock, which explains the different oil fingerprintings and the vertical and lateral differences in their biomarkers. The main role in the formation of deposits in the stratum played the lateral migration of hydrocarbons from the most submerged parts.\n Rock -Eval results also enabled to clarify the reasons for the different compositions of oil biomarkers: for example, by pyrolysis, the studied core samples from the Permian- Triassic and Triassic deposits of Oymashaa, Atambay -Sartyube and Pridorozhnoye are so thermally overmature that they are in the zone of gas generation and possess low generative potential, and as shown by biomarker analysis, their oils have such a high thermal maturity that only tiny amount of biomarkers is left. This circumstance is reflected in a sharp reduction in the resources of liquid hydrocarbons in Permian- Triassic deposits compared to Jurassic deposits and in an equally sharp increase in the share of gas formation.\n Also \"oil-source rock correlation\" studies were made to discern genetic link between oils and hydrocarbons extracted from potential source rocks.","PeriodicalId":131012,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, November 16, 2022","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, November 16, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212078-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper presents the results of fingerprinting and biomarker analysis of 183 crude oil samples derived from 19 oil and gas fields in the South Mangyshlak basin and Rock -Eval pyrolysis performed on 93 core samples from 12 fields of this basin. Geochemical atlas was made based on the oil fingerprinting studies, according to which, the studied fields of the South- Mangyshlak basin can be divided into 3 groups: same type of oils on the scale of groups of fields. This group includes Permian-Triassic oils of the Karaginskaya Saddle (Northern Karagiye, Atambay, Alatyube, Ashchiagar) and the Peschannomyssko-Rakushechnaya uplift zone (Oymasha), which have very similar oil fingerprinting either within each field or on the scale of these fields. oils of the same type within the same field. The second group includes oils from Pridorozhnoye, Airantakyr, Burmasha and Bekturly fields, each of which has its own unique oil fingerprinting of light aromatic hydrocarbons. different types of oils within the same field. This group includes oils from the rest of the studied Zhetybay- Uzen steps such as Asar, East Zhetybay, South Zhetybay, Aktas, Turkmenoy, Tasbulat, Uzen and Karamandybas fields, since within each of these fields were identified several different groups of oils that require a detailed study of their biomarkers to determine their genetic origin and trace hydrocarbon migration pathways. The obtained results of oil fingerprinting are consistent with their biomarker compositions, according to which the oils of the first group, identified by their fingerprinting, were generated from marine shaly source rocks, while those of the second group were from shaly source rocks, deposited in whether marine or lacustrine environments. The biomarker composition of the third group oils exhibited that the oils within each of these fields have at least two genetic sources: the oils of the lower pay zones have shaly marine OM source, while those of the upper upper pay zones were formed by OM deposited in lacustrine environment. Their biomarkers clearly show a regular change in the contribution of lacustrine OM input to marine one with the depth increase of pay zones and within the field of this group thermally more mature oils of a marine source (23-24 horizons Uzen and Karamandybas, J-10 and J-11 fields of Asar, Zhetybay, Zhetybay East) were mixed with relatively lower mature oils of the upper lacustrine source (13-16 th pay zones in Uzen and Karamandybas, J-J-3a, J-4a in Asar field, J-5 in Zhetybay, J-1 in Zhetybay East) with their upward migration. To characterize source rocks, where the studied oils were generated, Rock-Eval pyrolysis was performed on core samples of different ages, which revealed that in reality the reservoirs of the Asar, Zhetybay, Karamandybas, Uzen and Akkar fields can be considered synclinal, that means, it serves as both reservoir and source rock, which explains the different oil fingerprintings and the vertical and lateral differences in their biomarkers. The main role in the formation of deposits in the stratum played the lateral migration of hydrocarbons from the most submerged parts. Rock -Eval results also enabled to clarify the reasons for the different compositions of oil biomarkers: for example, by pyrolysis, the studied core samples from the Permian- Triassic and Triassic deposits of Oymashaa, Atambay -Sartyube and Pridorozhnoye are so thermally overmature that they are in the zone of gas generation and possess low generative potential, and as shown by biomarker analysis, their oils have such a high thermal maturity that only tiny amount of biomarkers is left. This circumstance is reflected in a sharp reduction in the resources of liquid hydrocarbons in Permian- Triassic deposits compared to Jurassic deposits and in an equally sharp increase in the share of gas formation. Also "oil-source rock correlation" studies were made to discern genetic link between oils and hydrocarbons extracted from potential source rocks.
原油与烃源岩地球化学图谱及油源对比——以哈萨克斯坦Mangyshlak盆地油气田为例
本文介绍了南曼吉什拉克盆地19个油气田的183份原油样品的指纹图谱和生物标志物分析结果,并对该盆地12个油田的93份岩心样品进行了岩石热解评价。在石油指纹图谱研究的基础上,绘制了南曼什拉克盆地的地球化学图谱,根据图谱,将研究油田划分为3组:同一类型的油田在油田群的尺度上。该组包括Karaginskaya Saddle (Northern Karagiye, Atambay, Alatyube, Ashchiagar)和Peschannomyssko-Rakushechnaya隆起带(Oymasha)的二叠纪-三叠纪油,无论是在每个油田内部还是在这些油田的规模上都具有非常相似的油指纹。同一油田中相同类型的油。第二组包括Pridorozhnoye、Airantakyr、Burmasha和Bekturly油田的石油,每个油田都有自己独特的轻芳香烃石油指纹。同一油田中不同类型的油。这一组包括来自已研究的Zhetybay- Uzen步骤的其余部分的油,如Asar, East Zhetybay, South Zhetybay, Aktas, Turkmenoy, Tasbulat, Uzen和Karamandybas油田,因为在每个油田中都确定了几个不同的油组,需要对其生物标志物进行详细研究,以确定其遗传起源和微量烃运移途径。石油指纹图谱结果与生物标志物组成一致,指纹图谱鉴定的第一组原油来源于海相泥质烃源岩,第二组原油来源于海相或湖相环境的泥质烃源岩。第三组油的生物标志物组成表明,每个油田内的油至少有两种成因来源:低油层的油为泥相海相有机质,而上油层的油为湖相环境沉积的有机质。定期改变他们的生物标记清楚地表明海军一号湖OM输入的贡献支付的深度增加区域和领域内的这组热更成熟的海洋的油源(23 - 24日视野Uzen Karamandybas, j - 10和J-11 Asar、Zhetybay, Zhetybay东部)是相对较低成熟油拌上湖源(13 - 16 th支付区Uzen和Karamandybas J-J-3a, J-4a在Asar领域J-5 Zhetybay,J-1在浙东),它们向上迁移。为了表征油源岩,对不同年龄的岩心样品进行了rock - eval热解,结果表明,Asar、Zhetybay、Karamandybas、Uzen和Akkar油田的储层实际上可以认为是向斜的,即既可以作为储层又可以作为烃源岩,这解释了不同的油指纹和生物标志物的垂直和横向差异。地层中沉积形成的主要作用是烃类从最深处的侧向运移。岩石评价结果还阐明了石油生物标志物组成不同的原因:例如,通过热解,研究的Oymashaa、Atambay - sartyube和Pridorozhnoye的二叠系-三叠系和三叠系矿床的岩心样品热过成熟,处于生气区,生气潜力低,生物标志物分析表明,其油热成熟度高,生物标志物含量很少。这种情况反映在二叠系—三叠系与侏罗系相比,液态烃资源急剧减少,而天然气形成份额同样急剧增加。此外,还进行了“油源对比”研究,以辨别从潜在烃源岩中提取的油和碳氢化合物之间的遗传联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信