Australia’s Role in the Global Governance of Migrant Labour

Giovanni Di Lieto
{"title":"Australia’s Role in the Global Governance of Migrant Labour","authors":"Giovanni Di Lieto","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3266294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is in Australia’s best interest to promote and spearhead an international body dealing with issues of migration for the purposes of employment, here called the “Organization for Migrant Labour” (OML) for purposes of simplicity. The OML is seen here as the missing link in the international economic law area in comparison to a labour equivalent of the World Trade Organization. The hypothetical institutional architecture here proposed is grounded in current political and legal realities, thus taking into account the core normative issues, problems and literature that in recent times have emerged at the institutional, policy and scholarly levels. Accordingly, the following analysis seeks to tackle the major issue of state/OML interface, namely the extent to which Australia might derogate border sovereignty, as well as the effects of a globally structured migrant labour and its transnational arrangements on Australian social security aspects. Effectively, this submission argues that assuming leadership in the global migration governance discourse should be framed and justified in terms of reclaiming Australia’s sovereignty, rather than ceding it.","PeriodicalId":314073,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Transnational Labor Issues (Topic)","volume":"2011 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Transnational Labor Issues (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3266294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is in Australia’s best interest to promote and spearhead an international body dealing with issues of migration for the purposes of employment, here called the “Organization for Migrant Labour” (OML) for purposes of simplicity. The OML is seen here as the missing link in the international economic law area in comparison to a labour equivalent of the World Trade Organization. The hypothetical institutional architecture here proposed is grounded in current political and legal realities, thus taking into account the core normative issues, problems and literature that in recent times have emerged at the institutional, policy and scholarly levels. Accordingly, the following analysis seeks to tackle the major issue of state/OML interface, namely the extent to which Australia might derogate border sovereignty, as well as the effects of a globally structured migrant labour and its transnational arrangements on Australian social security aspects. Effectively, this submission argues that assuming leadership in the global migration governance discourse should be framed and justified in terms of reclaiming Australia’s sovereignty, rather than ceding it.
澳大利亚在全球移民劳工治理中的作用
促进和领导一个处理以就业为目的的移徙问题的国际机构符合澳大利亚的最大利益,为简单起见,这里称其为“移徙劳工组织”。在这里,与劳工等同的世界贸易组织相比,劳工法被视为国际经济法领域缺失的一环。这里提出的假设的制度架构是基于当前的政治和法律现实,因此考虑到最近在制度、政策和学术层面出现的核心规范问题、问题和文献。因此,下面的分析试图解决国家/移徙组织界面的主要问题,即澳大利亚可能减损边界主权的程度,以及全球结构的移徙劳工及其跨国安排对澳大利亚社会安全方面的影响。实际上,本意见书认为,在全球移民治理话语中发挥领导作用的框架和理由应该是收回澳大利亚的主权,而不是放弃它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信