Accessibility of Archival Reference Services

Nindya Indrasweri, Elya Riska Dwi Wahyuni, Rina Rakhmawati
{"title":"Accessibility of Archival Reference Services","authors":"Nindya Indrasweri, Elya Riska Dwi Wahyuni, Rina Rakhmawati","doi":"10.20473/rlj.v8-i2.2022.199-206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background of the study: Archival services are the final stage of records management, if they are based on an archive lifecycle approach. Accessibility aspects need to be studied in an effort to optimize archiving services so that archives can be widely used by the community.\nPurpose: This paper describes the process of archiving services and the accessibility aspects of archiving services carried out by Dinas Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan Kabupaten Sleman.\nMethod: This research was a descriptive qualitative approach. Data was collected through observations, interviews, and literature studies. The data then has been analyzed in the following stages: observing the data, developing general sense, coding, compiling a narrative framework for presenting the results of data interpretation, and interpreting the data using data triangulation techniques.\nFindings: The accessibility aspect of archiving services at the Sleman Regency Library and Archives Service is viewed from four indicators, namely policies, facilities and infrastructure, service personnel, and archive user satisfaction. In policy indicators, the agency has been guided by legal products that are applied to technical archiving services, both at local and national levels. In terms of facilities and infrastructure indicators, in general, the department has met the minimum standard of availability and condition of archival service facilities and infrastructure.\nConclusion: There are limitations in this study, namely the limitations of the analysis of each indicator which does not describe in depth so that archival services in the office are declared affordable. In addition, it is necessary to carry out a critical analysis of the results of the user satisfaction survey, namely through in-depth interview techniques to comprehensively understand the archive service process at the office.","PeriodicalId":250848,"journal":{"name":"Record and Library Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Record and Library Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/rlj.v8-i2.2022.199-206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background of the study: Archival services are the final stage of records management, if they are based on an archive lifecycle approach. Accessibility aspects need to be studied in an effort to optimize archiving services so that archives can be widely used by the community. Purpose: This paper describes the process of archiving services and the accessibility aspects of archiving services carried out by Dinas Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan Kabupaten Sleman. Method: This research was a descriptive qualitative approach. Data was collected through observations, interviews, and literature studies. The data then has been analyzed in the following stages: observing the data, developing general sense, coding, compiling a narrative framework for presenting the results of data interpretation, and interpreting the data using data triangulation techniques. Findings: The accessibility aspect of archiving services at the Sleman Regency Library and Archives Service is viewed from four indicators, namely policies, facilities and infrastructure, service personnel, and archive user satisfaction. In policy indicators, the agency has been guided by legal products that are applied to technical archiving services, both at local and national levels. In terms of facilities and infrastructure indicators, in general, the department has met the minimum standard of availability and condition of archival service facilities and infrastructure. Conclusion: There are limitations in this study, namely the limitations of the analysis of each indicator which does not describe in depth so that archival services in the office are declared affordable. In addition, it is necessary to carry out a critical analysis of the results of the user satisfaction survey, namely through in-depth interview techniques to comprehensively understand the archive service process at the office.
档案参考服务的可及性
研究背景:档案服务是档案管理的最后阶段,如果它们是基于档案生命周期方法的话。为了优化档案服务,使档案能够被社会广泛使用,需要研究可访问性方面的问题。目的:本文描述了Dinas Perpustakaan dan Kearsipan Kabupaten Sleman开展的归档服务的过程和可访问性方面。方法:本研究采用描述性定性方法。通过观察、访谈和文献研究收集数据。然后在以下阶段对数据进行分析:观察数据,发展一般意义,编码,编写用于呈现数据解释结果的叙事框架,以及使用数据三角测量技术解释数据。研究结果:从政策、设施和基础设施、服务人员和档案用户满意度四个指标来评价Sleman Regency图书馆和档案馆档案服务的可及性。在政策指标方面,该机构以适用于地方和国家两级技术存档服务的法律产品为指导。在设施和基础设施指标方面,总体而言,部门达到了档案服务设施和基础设施的可用性和条件的最低标准。结论:本研究存在局限性,即对各指标的分析不够深入,不足以使办公室的档案服务被认为是负担得起的。此外,有必要对用户满意度调查结果进行批判性分析,即通过深度访谈技术全面了解办公室的档案服务流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信