Bridging the Gap: Highly Depleted Reservoir Entry in a Mature HPHT Field

Michael Cadd, Susannah Stott, R. Graham, Ryan Nowell, Josef Schachner
{"title":"Bridging the Gap: Highly Depleted Reservoir Entry in a Mature HPHT Field","authors":"Michael Cadd, Susannah Stott, R. Graham, Ryan Nowell, Josef Schachner","doi":"10.2118/210543-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This case study shows how three highly depleted reservoirs with large negative drilling windows, previously considered un-drillable, were safely entered by combining Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD) and drill-in liner technologies with a novel losses response strategy.\n The challenge was to bridge the gap between the high pore pressure overburden and the low fracture strength reservoir. The reservoir had been depleted by some 12,000psi since production started, creating a 3,000psi negative drilling window. Conventional strategies to prevent losses were deemed unlikely to succeed, and the focus was instead on how best to respond to the near-inevitable onset of total losses. The gap was bridged using a low static mud weight in combination with high applied surface back pressure to give an Equivalent Mud Weight (EMW) suitable for the high-pressure overburden, whilst allowing immediate reduction in bottom hole pressure in the event of total losses on entry into the weakened reservoir. Endurance testing allowed the MPD equipment to be operated outside of its normal pressure envelope. In the reference case, losses would be managed by reducing Surface Back Pressure (SBP) while continuing to drill ahead. In the low-pressure case, Pressurised Mud Cap Drilling (PMCD) would be used to bullhead the well to a lighter mud while drilling ahead, before restoring returns. A contingency plan was in place for managing elevated gas levels in the returns, which was anticipated following a large reduction of bottom hole pressure across the overburden shales. In the extreme case where high gas levels from the shales prevented bringing returns to surface, cementing would also be carried out in Pressurised Mud Cap mode. A drill-in liner was used because many of the scenarios would not permit safe tripping and Wellbore Strengthening material was included in the mud in an attempt to reduce the severity of the losses.\n Total losses were seen on two of the three wells, and all three wells were successfully completed. This paper will discuss the technology and techniques used along with the planning and procedures required to enable successful well construction in this challenging environment.","PeriodicalId":336268,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, September 28, 2022","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, September 28, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/210543-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This case study shows how three highly depleted reservoirs with large negative drilling windows, previously considered un-drillable, were safely entered by combining Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD) and drill-in liner technologies with a novel losses response strategy. The challenge was to bridge the gap between the high pore pressure overburden and the low fracture strength reservoir. The reservoir had been depleted by some 12,000psi since production started, creating a 3,000psi negative drilling window. Conventional strategies to prevent losses were deemed unlikely to succeed, and the focus was instead on how best to respond to the near-inevitable onset of total losses. The gap was bridged using a low static mud weight in combination with high applied surface back pressure to give an Equivalent Mud Weight (EMW) suitable for the high-pressure overburden, whilst allowing immediate reduction in bottom hole pressure in the event of total losses on entry into the weakened reservoir. Endurance testing allowed the MPD equipment to be operated outside of its normal pressure envelope. In the reference case, losses would be managed by reducing Surface Back Pressure (SBP) while continuing to drill ahead. In the low-pressure case, Pressurised Mud Cap Drilling (PMCD) would be used to bullhead the well to a lighter mud while drilling ahead, before restoring returns. A contingency plan was in place for managing elevated gas levels in the returns, which was anticipated following a large reduction of bottom hole pressure across the overburden shales. In the extreme case where high gas levels from the shales prevented bringing returns to surface, cementing would also be carried out in Pressurised Mud Cap mode. A drill-in liner was used because many of the scenarios would not permit safe tripping and Wellbore Strengthening material was included in the mud in an attempt to reduce the severity of the losses. Total losses were seen on two of the three wells, and all three wells were successfully completed. This paper will discuss the technology and techniques used along with the planning and procedures required to enable successful well construction in this challenging environment.
弥合差距:成熟高温高压油田的高衰竭油藏入口
本案例研究展示了如何将控压钻井(MPD)和尾管钻进技术与一种新的漏失响应策略相结合,安全地进入三个高度枯竭的储层,这些储层具有较大的负钻井窗口,以前被认为是不可钻的。挑战在于如何在高孔隙压力覆盖层和低断裂强度储层之间架起桥梁。自生产开始以来,储层已经枯竭了约12,000psi,造成了3,000psi的负钻井窗口。防止损失的传统策略被认为不太可能成功,取而代之的是,重点是如何最好地应对几乎不可避免的全面损失。利用较低的静泥浆比重和较高的地面背压来填补裂缝,从而获得适用于高压覆盖层的等效泥浆比重(EMW),同时在进入弱储层时,如果发生完全漏失,可以立即降低井底压力。耐久性测试允许MPD设备在正常压力范围外运行。在参考案例中,在继续钻进的同时,可以通过降低地面背压(SBP)来控制漏失。在低压情况下,加压泥浆帽钻井(PMCD)将在钻井前将井顶压至较轻的泥浆,然后再恢复产量。在覆盖层页岩的井底压力大幅降低后,预计会出现井底压力升高的情况,因此制定了应急计划来管理回采过程中天然气含量升高的情况。在极端情况下,当页岩气含量过高,无法将井底返至地面时,也可以采用加压泥浆帽模式进行固井。由于许多情况不允许安全起下钻,因此使用了钻入尾管,并且在泥浆中加入了井眼强化材料,以减少漏失的严重程度。三口井中有两口出现了漏失,三口井均成功完井。本文将讨论在这种充满挑战的环境中成功建井所需的技术和工艺以及规划和程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信