EXPLORING PATHWAYS TO NEGATE SAFETY CONCERNS AND IMPROVE PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE OF ALTERNATIVE FUELLED ELECTRIC VEHICLES

Hanlin Li, R. Welsh, A. Morris
{"title":"EXPLORING PATHWAYS TO NEGATE SAFETY CONCERNS AND IMPROVE PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE OF ALTERNATIVE FUELLED ELECTRIC VEHICLES","authors":"Hanlin Li, R. Welsh, A. Morris","doi":"10.2495/UT180101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Restricted emission regulations force the transportation sector to seek a better vehicle fuel solution, and the uptake of Electric Vehicle is to be encouraged because it has no exhaust emission. Previous literature had shown that range freedom and cost were the main barriers and safety aspects were often\nconsidered as technological issues. Recent research indicates that early adopters of innovative EVs do have concerns about safety issues although it was not on top of the list. However, research into the public perception of alternative fuelled EVs in terms of safety has been limited to date. In this paper, a\nquantitative study is undertaken to investigate the public safety concern of three types of vehicle powertrain: the internal combustion engine, the hybrid electric and the solely electric vehicle. The survey consisted of two identical sets of questionnaires (one was in English, and another in Chinese) to\ncollect data from people with different cultural background. It was expected that this would provide a reasonable number of responses to reflect the public. This study indicates that the main safety concerns are associated with the level of vehicle knowledge and the power supply components despite the powertrain type. The high awareness of mechanical failure is only evident in the conventional fuel\npowertrain and gradually reduced when moving towards solely electric powertrain to compensate for the rise of electrical failure awareness. It also indicates that the awareness of the specifics of hydrogen\nfuel cell vehicles is not widespread amongst the public as almost all the participants considered that the electric vehicle is powered by batteries only. As a result, this paper suggests that there is a need to educate the drivers with the desired knowledge while simply driving the vehicle could potentially be an effective way to improve public acceptance of any alternative fuel vehicle","PeriodicalId":315494,"journal":{"name":"Urban Transport XXIV","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Transport XXIV","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/UT180101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Restricted emission regulations force the transportation sector to seek a better vehicle fuel solution, and the uptake of Electric Vehicle is to be encouraged because it has no exhaust emission. Previous literature had shown that range freedom and cost were the main barriers and safety aspects were often considered as technological issues. Recent research indicates that early adopters of innovative EVs do have concerns about safety issues although it was not on top of the list. However, research into the public perception of alternative fuelled EVs in terms of safety has been limited to date. In this paper, a quantitative study is undertaken to investigate the public safety concern of three types of vehicle powertrain: the internal combustion engine, the hybrid electric and the solely electric vehicle. The survey consisted of two identical sets of questionnaires (one was in English, and another in Chinese) to collect data from people with different cultural background. It was expected that this would provide a reasonable number of responses to reflect the public. This study indicates that the main safety concerns are associated with the level of vehicle knowledge and the power supply components despite the powertrain type. The high awareness of mechanical failure is only evident in the conventional fuel powertrain and gradually reduced when moving towards solely electric powertrain to compensate for the rise of electrical failure awareness. It also indicates that the awareness of the specifics of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles is not widespread amongst the public as almost all the participants considered that the electric vehicle is powered by batteries only. As a result, this paper suggests that there is a need to educate the drivers with the desired knowledge while simply driving the vehicle could potentially be an effective way to improve public acceptance of any alternative fuel vehicle
探索消除安全问题的途径,提高公众对替代燃料电动汽车的接受程度
限制排放法规迫使运输部门寻求更好的汽车燃料解决方案,电动汽车的采用是受到鼓励的,因为它没有废气排放。以前的文献表明,范围自由和费用是主要的障碍,而安全方面通常被认为是技术问题。最近的研究表明,创新电动汽车的早期采用者确实担心安全问题,尽管这并不是最重要的问题。然而,到目前为止,关于公众对替代燃料电动汽车安全性看法的研究还很有限。本文对内燃机、混合动力汽车和纯电动汽车这三种汽车动力系统的公共安全问题进行了定量研究。该调查包括两套相同的问卷(一套是英文的,另一套是中文的),以收集来自不同文化背景的人的数据。预期这将提供数目合理的反应,以反映公众的意见。该研究表明,主要的安全问题与车辆知识水平和电源组件有关,而不是动力总成类型。机械故障的高度意识只在传统的燃油动力系统中表现明显,当转向纯电动动力系统时逐渐减少,以补偿电气故障意识的上升。这也表明公众对氢燃料电池汽车的具体情况的认识并不普遍,因为几乎所有的参与者都认为电动汽车只由电池供电。因此,本文建议,有必要对司机进行必要的知识教育,同时简单地驾驶车辆可能是提高公众对任何替代燃料车辆接受程度的有效方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信