For Reasonably Protected Competition and Economic Regulation by "Atomic Balance"

Revaz Lordkipanidze
{"title":"For Reasonably Protected Competition and Economic Regulation by \"Atomic Balance\"","authors":"Revaz Lordkipanidze","doi":"10.56580/geomedi0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The presented research showed, that the US has the best experience in an evaluating and protecting competition, but there is one essential imperfection in the understanding of perfect competition since the time of the classics of economic theory. This is important to have many competitors, but not very or infinitely many, as traditional \"classic\" specialists and even some official structures and persons think about fineness of really genius competition. After pandemic and many conflicts period in modern global development, if we again don't correct this understanding, we can finally damage democracy with science-intensive businesses and help to different dictatorial monopolies. If in the early years of my research, I considered the main obstacle to effective competition - unscrupulous big business, but now I think that an equally serious problem is the artificial fragmentation of honest and talented big producers. Only with a reasonably protected competitive environment, by our observation of scienceintensive areas of Healthcare Economy and Machine-building Industry, it is possible to organize a reasonable combination of state regulation factors and free market self-regulation. The factors of regulation and self-regulation should be in non-monopoly equilibrium, like electrons and protons in an atom. Otherwise, as we know from history, we get different dictatorships or great depressions of surplus.","PeriodicalId":261879,"journal":{"name":"MODERN ISSUES OF MEDICINE AND MANAGEMENT","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODERN ISSUES OF MEDICINE AND MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56580/geomedi0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The presented research showed, that the US has the best experience in an evaluating and protecting competition, but there is one essential imperfection in the understanding of perfect competition since the time of the classics of economic theory. This is important to have many competitors, but not very or infinitely many, as traditional "classic" specialists and even some official structures and persons think about fineness of really genius competition. After pandemic and many conflicts period in modern global development, if we again don't correct this understanding, we can finally damage democracy with science-intensive businesses and help to different dictatorial monopolies. If in the early years of my research, I considered the main obstacle to effective competition - unscrupulous big business, but now I think that an equally serious problem is the artificial fragmentation of honest and talented big producers. Only with a reasonably protected competitive environment, by our observation of scienceintensive areas of Healthcare Economy and Machine-building Industry, it is possible to organize a reasonable combination of state regulation factors and free market self-regulation. The factors of regulation and self-regulation should be in non-monopoly equilibrium, like electrons and protons in an atom. Otherwise, as we know from history, we get different dictatorships or great depressions of surplus.
合理保护竞争与“原子平衡”经济规制
本文的研究表明,美国在评估和保护竞争方面的经验是最好的,但在对完全竞争的理解上存在着自经济理论经典以来的一个本质缺陷。有很多竞争者是很重要的,但不是很多或无限多,就像传统的“经典”专家,甚至一些官方机构和个人认为真正的天才竞争是好的一样。在现代全球发展的流行病和许多冲突时期,如果我们再次不纠正这种认识,我们最终会以科学密集型企业破坏民主,并有助于不同的独裁垄断。如果在我早年的研究中,我认为有效竞争的主要障碍是不择手段的大企业,但现在我认为,一个同样严重的问题是对诚实和有才华的大生产商的人为分割。根据我们对医疗经济和机械制造业的科学密集型领域的观察,只有在一个合理保护的竞争环境下,才有可能组织国家调控因素和自由市场自我调节的合理结合。调节因素和自我调节因素应该像原子中的电子和质子一样处于非垄断平衡状态。否则,正如我们从历史中所知,我们会遇到不同的独裁统治或盈余大萧条。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信