A Review and Comparative Analysis of Vulnerability Scanning Tools for Wireless LANs

Abheenesh Kejiou, Girish Bekaroo
{"title":"A Review and Comparative Analysis of Vulnerability Scanning Tools for Wireless LANs","authors":"Abheenesh Kejiou, Girish Bekaroo","doi":"10.1109/NextComp55567.2022.9932245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 21st century has been characterized by the widespread proliferation and use of wireless networks, notably, Wireless LANs, that enhanced access to information and resources to businesses and the society at large. However, WLANs are vulnerable to a range of security issues such as replay and KRACK attacks. In addition, the underlying security protocols used within WLANs, including Wired-Equivalent Privacy and the different versions of the Wi-Fi Protected Access have had security vulnerabilities that led to deprecation of few previous versions. As such, in the process of hardening security of such networks, vulnerability assessment is important and for this, various vulnerability scanners are available on the market. This paper critically reviews and analyses key vulnerability scanners for the context of WLANs. As part of the investigation, four tools, notably Nessus Vulnerability Scanner, OpenVAS, Nexpose and GFI LanGuard are reviewed, and insights are provided following practical utilization. As key findings, different vulnerability scanners were found to address different kinds and number of vulnerabilities, where some of them can be more granular than others, even in terms of output provided to the user. Moreover, the scan duration was not consistent across tools and does not corelate with the number of vulnerabilities detected.","PeriodicalId":422085,"journal":{"name":"2022 3rd International Conference on Next Generation Computing Applications (NextComp)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 3rd International Conference on Next Generation Computing Applications (NextComp)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NextComp55567.2022.9932245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The 21st century has been characterized by the widespread proliferation and use of wireless networks, notably, Wireless LANs, that enhanced access to information and resources to businesses and the society at large. However, WLANs are vulnerable to a range of security issues such as replay and KRACK attacks. In addition, the underlying security protocols used within WLANs, including Wired-Equivalent Privacy and the different versions of the Wi-Fi Protected Access have had security vulnerabilities that led to deprecation of few previous versions. As such, in the process of hardening security of such networks, vulnerability assessment is important and for this, various vulnerability scanners are available on the market. This paper critically reviews and analyses key vulnerability scanners for the context of WLANs. As part of the investigation, four tools, notably Nessus Vulnerability Scanner, OpenVAS, Nexpose and GFI LanGuard are reviewed, and insights are provided following practical utilization. As key findings, different vulnerability scanners were found to address different kinds and number of vulnerabilities, where some of them can be more granular than others, even in terms of output provided to the user. Moreover, the scan duration was not consistent across tools and does not corelate with the number of vulnerabilities detected.
无线局域网漏洞扫描工具综述与比较分析
21世纪的特点是无线网络的广泛扩散和使用,特别是无线局域网,它增强了企业和整个社会对信息和资源的获取。然而,wlan容易受到一系列安全问题的攻击,例如重播和KRACK攻击。此外,在wlan中使用的底层安全协议(包括有线等效隐私和不同版本的Wi-Fi Protected Access)都存在安全漏洞,导致之前的几个版本被弃用。因此,在加强此类网络的安全性过程中,漏洞评估非常重要,为此,市场上有各种漏洞扫描程序。本文批判性地回顾和分析了wlan环境下的关键漏洞扫描器。作为调查的一部分,审查了四个工具,特别是Nessus Vulnerability Scanner, OpenVAS, Nexpose和GFI LanGuard,并在实际使用后提供了见解。主要发现是,不同的漏洞扫描器可以处理不同类型和数量的漏洞,其中一些漏洞可能比其他漏洞更细粒度,甚至就提供给用户的输出而言也是如此。此外,不同工具的扫描持续时间不一致,也与检测到的漏洞数量无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信