Nash equilibrium in allocating space for paid and free parking, taking into account the interests of motorists, city authorities, and parking owners

M. Koryagin
{"title":"Nash equilibrium in allocating space for paid and free parking, taking into account the interests of motorists, city authorities, and parking owners","authors":"M. Koryagin","doi":"10.36724/2072-8735-2022-16-7-36-43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of optimizаtion the distribution of urban territory near a center of gravity (airport, railway station, mall, etc.) between two types of parking lots: paid and free is considered. Obviously, under otherwise equal conditions the car user will choose free parking, but this will lead to an increase in the time to find a parking space. Therefore, paying for parking is beneficial for people who have a higher their value of time. Paid parking operator determine the size of the parking fee - if the price is low enough, all parking spaces will be occupied and there will be problems with parking, in addition, there will be lost profits. Lost profits will also occur if the price is high enough, because if the price goes up, fewer car users will be ready to use paid parking services. The city authorities' task is to determine part of the land which should be allocated for paid parking on the understanding that the rest of the land goes to free parking. The paid parking owners' task is to determine the optimal price in order to maximize the profit. Car users choose parking based on their value of time. A mathematical model was built with three types of participants: car users, municipal authorities and parking operators. The strategy of the passenger is the choice of parking, the goal is to minimize the cost and time. The strategy of the municipality is the allocation of territory for parking, the goal is similar to the goals of passengers. Parking operator with the strategy \"parking price\" achieves to maximize profit. The interaction of the participants is described within the framework of game theory, the objective functions of the players are considered, and the existence of the Nash equilibrium is proved. Numerical examples are considered, options for the development of the presented model are described. The dependence of characteristics on the total allocated number of parking spaces in two types of parking lots, the price of parking and the intensity of the car flow to the center of gravity is presented.","PeriodicalId":263691,"journal":{"name":"T-Comm","volume":"01 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"T-Comm","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36724/2072-8735-2022-16-7-36-43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The problem of optimizаtion the distribution of urban territory near a center of gravity (airport, railway station, mall, etc.) between two types of parking lots: paid and free is considered. Obviously, under otherwise equal conditions the car user will choose free parking, but this will lead to an increase in the time to find a parking space. Therefore, paying for parking is beneficial for people who have a higher their value of time. Paid parking operator determine the size of the parking fee - if the price is low enough, all parking spaces will be occupied and there will be problems with parking, in addition, there will be lost profits. Lost profits will also occur if the price is high enough, because if the price goes up, fewer car users will be ready to use paid parking services. The city authorities' task is to determine part of the land which should be allocated for paid parking on the understanding that the rest of the land goes to free parking. The paid parking owners' task is to determine the optimal price in order to maximize the profit. Car users choose parking based on their value of time. A mathematical model was built with three types of participants: car users, municipal authorities and parking operators. The strategy of the passenger is the choice of parking, the goal is to minimize the cost and time. The strategy of the municipality is the allocation of territory for parking, the goal is similar to the goals of passengers. Parking operator with the strategy "parking price" achieves to maximize profit. The interaction of the participants is described within the framework of game theory, the objective functions of the players are considered, and the existence of the Nash equilibrium is proved. Numerical examples are considered, options for the development of the presented model are described. The dependence of characteristics on the total allocated number of parking spaces in two types of parking lots, the price of parking and the intensity of the car flow to the center of gravity is presented.
在考虑驾驶者、市政当局和停车业主利益的情况下,分配付费和免费停车空间的纳什均衡
考虑了付费和免费两种停车场之间的城市重心(机场、火车站、商场等)附近区域分布的优化问题。显然,在其他条件相同的情况下,汽车使用者会选择免费停车,但这将导致寻找停车位的时间增加。因此,停车费对时间价值较高的人是有益的。付费停车运营商决定停车费的大小——如果价格足够低,所有的停车位都会被占用,停车就会出现问题,此外,还会有利润损失。如果价格足够高,也会出现利润损失,因为如果价格上涨,愿意使用付费停车服务的汽车用户就会减少。市政当局的任务是确定应该分配给付费停车的土地的一部分,而其余的土地则用于免费停车。付费车主的任务是确定最优价格,以实现利润最大化。汽车使用者根据他们的时间价值来选择停车。建立了一个数学模型,参与者有三种类型:汽车使用者、市政当局和停车场经营者。乘客的策略是停车的选择,目标是使成本和时间最小化。市政当局的策略是为停车分配领土,目标与乘客的目标相似。停车经营者通过“停车价格”策略实现利润最大化。在博弈论的框架内描述了参与者之间的相互作用,考虑了参与者的目标函数,证明了纳什均衡的存在性。考虑了数值实例,描述了所提出模型的发展选择。给出了两类停车场的特征与总分配车位数、停车价格和流向重心的车流强度的依赖关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信