Conceptual understanding of force concepts in the Ugandan context: A thread assessing performance and misconceptions

Kent Robert Kirya, T. Nuru, LakhanLal Yadav
{"title":"Conceptual understanding of force concepts in the Ugandan context: A thread assessing performance and misconceptions","authors":"Kent Robert Kirya, T. Nuru, LakhanLal Yadav","doi":"10.29333/mathsciteacher/12049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accepted: 16 Mar. 2022 The force concept inventory (FCI) is a set of multiple-choice items that has been administered and analyzed in a number of regions across the world. The purpose of this study is to evaluate students’ comprehension of force concepts, using a thread that examines and analyzes the most common force concept misunderstandings among students. The FCI is distributed to 1,440 senior four students from various Ugandan schools. The ITEMAN software is used to assess students’ performance. Then a few FCI items are examined to acquire a better grasp of the students’ misunderstandings. Using the Gnuplot software, we displayed the students’ total scores versus their percentage scores for each FCI alternative choice, which provides greater visual confirmation of the findings than statistical analysis. The findings show that misunderstandings dispersed in accordance with students’ performance. The distractors are the most appealing of the analyzed FCI items, with the highest percentages of students picking each alternate option. Imitating that students enter physics classes preconceived about their prior knowledge, viewpoints, ideas, and values. As a result, this study underlines to Ugandan physics teachers that students have misconceptions. Physics teachers and students should interact in an active learning environment using conceptual change methods to correct misconceptions.","PeriodicalId":343598,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/12049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Accepted: 16 Mar. 2022 The force concept inventory (FCI) is a set of multiple-choice items that has been administered and analyzed in a number of regions across the world. The purpose of this study is to evaluate students’ comprehension of force concepts, using a thread that examines and analyzes the most common force concept misunderstandings among students. The FCI is distributed to 1,440 senior four students from various Ugandan schools. The ITEMAN software is used to assess students’ performance. Then a few FCI items are examined to acquire a better grasp of the students’ misunderstandings. Using the Gnuplot software, we displayed the students’ total scores versus their percentage scores for each FCI alternative choice, which provides greater visual confirmation of the findings than statistical analysis. The findings show that misunderstandings dispersed in accordance with students’ performance. The distractors are the most appealing of the analyzed FCI items, with the highest percentages of students picking each alternate option. Imitating that students enter physics classes preconceived about their prior knowledge, viewpoints, ideas, and values. As a result, this study underlines to Ugandan physics teachers that students have misconceptions. Physics teachers and students should interact in an active learning environment using conceptual change methods to correct misconceptions.
乌干达背景下对武力概念的概念性理解:评估绩效和误解的线索
部队概念清单(FCI)是一组多项选择题,已在全球许多地区进行了管理和分析。本研究的目的是评估学生对力概念的理解,使用一条线来检查和分析学生中最常见的力概念误解。FCI分发给来自乌干达各学校的1 440名四年级学生。ITEMAN软件用于评估学生的表现。为了更好地掌握学生的误解,我们对几个FCI项目进行了检查。使用Gnuplot软件,我们显示了学生的总分和每个FCI替代选择的百分比分数,这比统计分析提供了更直观的结果确认。研究结果表明,误解随着学生的表现而消散。干扰因素是分析的FCI项目中最吸引人的,选择每个备选选项的学生比例最高。模仿学生进入物理课堂时对他们先前的知识、观点、想法和价值观有先入为主的认识。因此,这项研究向乌干达物理教师强调了学生的误解。物理教师和学生应该在一个积极的学习环境中互动,使用概念改变的方法来纠正误解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信