Slow Innovation in Europe’s Peripheral Regions: Innovation beyond Acceleration

H. Mayer
{"title":"Slow Innovation in Europe’s Peripheral Regions: Innovation beyond Acceleration","authors":"H. Mayer","doi":"10.1553/0x003b582d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Innovation processes are often conceptualized with an urban bias and are therefore theorized solely considering the perspective of the urban environment (e.g. close face-to-face contacts, dense urban milieus, fast interactions between a multitude and diverse actors, etc.). As a result, innovation theories do not sufficiently consider the context of the periphery and how this context may foster or hinder the development of innovative products, technologies and services. In the meantime, economic geographers started to conceptualize innovation processes in peripheral locations as ‘slow innovation’ (Shearmur 2015, 2017; Shearmur & Doloreux, 2016) and they have emphasized the need to consider innovative processes as more isolated, less dependent on frequent interactions with partners and more strategic in terms of seeking information and knowledge. Another stream of research that recently emerged, considers the periphery as a space in which creativity can more freely unfold because innovators are positioned at the fringes and are more free to experiment with unconventional ideas (Grabher2018). Less emphasis has been placed on the notion that peripheral spaces can also offer opportunities for experimentation because they afford innovative actors the opportunity to reflect, search, experiment and advance in undisturbed, more ‘slow’ ways, perhaps because they by choice are shielded from accelerating economic pressures. In this sense, the relative emptiness or thinness of the periphery can be considered not only as an asset for innovation, but also as an empowering characteristic for innovative behavior. This exploratory essay examines these processes through exploratory case studies of slow innovators in peripheral regions in the European Alps (Italy and Austria).","PeriodicalId":285026,"journal":{"name":"ISR-Forschungsberichte","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISR-Forschungsberichte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1553/0x003b582d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Innovation processes are often conceptualized with an urban bias and are therefore theorized solely considering the perspective of the urban environment (e.g. close face-to-face contacts, dense urban milieus, fast interactions between a multitude and diverse actors, etc.). As a result, innovation theories do not sufficiently consider the context of the periphery and how this context may foster or hinder the development of innovative products, technologies and services. In the meantime, economic geographers started to conceptualize innovation processes in peripheral locations as ‘slow innovation’ (Shearmur 2015, 2017; Shearmur & Doloreux, 2016) and they have emphasized the need to consider innovative processes as more isolated, less dependent on frequent interactions with partners and more strategic in terms of seeking information and knowledge. Another stream of research that recently emerged, considers the periphery as a space in which creativity can more freely unfold because innovators are positioned at the fringes and are more free to experiment with unconventional ideas (Grabher2018). Less emphasis has been placed on the notion that peripheral spaces can also offer opportunities for experimentation because they afford innovative actors the opportunity to reflect, search, experiment and advance in undisturbed, more ‘slow’ ways, perhaps because they by choice are shielded from accelerating economic pressures. In this sense, the relative emptiness or thinness of the periphery can be considered not only as an asset for innovation, but also as an empowering characteristic for innovative behavior. This exploratory essay examines these processes through exploratory case studies of slow innovators in peripheral regions in the European Alps (Italy and Austria).
欧洲外围地区的缓慢创新:超越加速的创新
创新过程的概念化往往带有城市偏见,因此仅考虑城市环境的视角(例如,密切的面对面接触、密集的城市环境、众多和不同参与者之间的快速互动等)来进行理论化。因此,创新理论没有充分考虑周边环境以及这种环境如何促进或阻碍创新产品、技术和服务的发展。与此同时,经济地理学家开始将周边地区的创新过程概念化为“慢创新”(Shearmur 2015, 2017;Shearmur & Doloreux, 2016),他们强调需要将创新过程视为更孤立的,更少依赖于与合作伙伴的频繁互动,在寻求信息和知识方面更具战略性。最近出现的另一项研究认为,边缘地带是一个创造力可以更自由地展开的空间,因为创新者位于边缘地带,可以更自由地尝试非常规的想法(Grabher2018)。外围空间也可以为实验提供机会,因为它们为创新行为者提供了以不受干扰的、更“缓慢”的方式进行反思、搜索、实验和进步的机会,这一概念得到的重视较少,也许是因为它们选择免受加速的经济压力的影响。从这个意义上说,外围的相对空虚或稀薄不仅可以被视为创新的资产,而且可以被视为创新行为的授权特征。这篇探索性的文章通过对欧洲阿尔卑斯山周边地区(意大利和奥地利)缓慢创新者的探索性案例研究来考察这些过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信