A comparison of optimistic approaches to collaborative editing of Wiki pages

C. Ignat, G. Oster, P. Molli, Michèle Cart, J. Ferrié, Anne-Marie Kermarrec, P. Sutra, M. Shapiro, Lamia Benmouffok, Jean-Michel Busca, R. Guerraoui
{"title":"A comparison of optimistic approaches to collaborative editing of Wiki pages","authors":"C. Ignat, G. Oster, P. Molli, Michèle Cart, J. Ferrié, Anne-Marie Kermarrec, P. Sutra, M. Shapiro, Lamia Benmouffok, Jean-Michel Busca, R. Guerraoui","doi":"10.1109/COLCOM.2007.4553878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wikis, a popular tool for sharing knowledge, are basically collaborative editing systems. However, existing Wiki systems offer limited support for co-operative authoring, and they do not scale well, because they are based on a centralised architecture. This paper compares the well-known centralised MediaWiki system with several peer-to-peer approaches to editing of wiki pages: an operational transformation approach (MOT2), a commutativity-oriented approach (WOOTO) and a conflict resolution approach (ACF). We evaluate and compare them, according to a number of qualitative and quantitative metrics.","PeriodicalId":340691,"journal":{"name":"2007 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom 2007)","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom 2007)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COLCOM.2007.4553878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Wikis, a popular tool for sharing knowledge, are basically collaborative editing systems. However, existing Wiki systems offer limited support for co-operative authoring, and they do not scale well, because they are based on a centralised architecture. This paper compares the well-known centralised MediaWiki system with several peer-to-peer approaches to editing of wiki pages: an operational transformation approach (MOT2), a commutativity-oriented approach (WOOTO) and a conflict resolution approach (ACF). We evaluate and compare them, according to a number of qualitative and quantitative metrics.
Wiki页面协同编辑的乐观方法的比较
wiki是一种流行的知识共享工具,基本上是协作编辑系统。然而,现有的Wiki系统对合作创作提供的支持有限,而且由于它们是基于一个集中的架构,它们不能很好地扩展。本文比较了著名的集中式MediaWiki系统与几种点对点编辑wiki页面的方法:操作转换方法(MOT2),面向交换的方法(WOOTO)和冲突解决方法(ACF)。我们根据一些定性和定量指标对它们进行评估和比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信