Linking knowledge management valuation to intellectual capital: A conceptual study

Latifa Oufkir, M. Fredj, I. Kassou
{"title":"Linking knowledge management valuation to intellectual capital: A conceptual study","authors":"Latifa Oufkir, M. Fredj, I. Kassou","doi":"10.1109/ISKO-Maghreb.2013.6728169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Knowledge management (KM) and intellectual capital (IC) are two big research questions in nowadays management topics. In fact, the relation between these two subjects varies from analogy to complementarity. Defining these concepts remains for long years a controversy, because both topics imply different disciplines. And despite the multidisciplinary of the field, it is agreed that KM treats both knowledge as an object, and management as a set of tools and techniques. The association between these two aspects is the essence of KM. Whereas with the IC, the focus is much on the effect and value generated by the intellectual asset, which implies a notion of valuation and measurement. The relationship between concepts of IC and KM needs to be redefined in view of field progress. In our paper, we assume that “IC is suited to KM valuation and performance measurement”: a conceptual review of the literature within this work should give foundation to this hypothesis. Further foreseen analytical verification may empower it to be a basic rule on the design of future KM valuation indicators.","PeriodicalId":110586,"journal":{"name":"2013 3rd International Symposium ISKO-Maghreb","volume":"1788 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 3rd International Symposium ISKO-Maghreb","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISKO-Maghreb.2013.6728169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Knowledge management (KM) and intellectual capital (IC) are two big research questions in nowadays management topics. In fact, the relation between these two subjects varies from analogy to complementarity. Defining these concepts remains for long years a controversy, because both topics imply different disciplines. And despite the multidisciplinary of the field, it is agreed that KM treats both knowledge as an object, and management as a set of tools and techniques. The association between these two aspects is the essence of KM. Whereas with the IC, the focus is much on the effect and value generated by the intellectual asset, which implies a notion of valuation and measurement. The relationship between concepts of IC and KM needs to be redefined in view of field progress. In our paper, we assume that “IC is suited to KM valuation and performance measurement”: a conceptual review of the literature within this work should give foundation to this hypothesis. Further foreseen analytical verification may empower it to be a basic rule on the design of future KM valuation indicators.
链接知识管理价值与智力资本:一个概念研究
知识管理(KM)和智力资本(IC)是当今管理领域的两大研究课题。事实上,这两个学科之间的关系从类比到互补。对这些概念的定义多年来一直存在争议,因为这两个主题意味着不同的学科。尽管这个领域是多学科的,但人们一致认为,知识管理既将知识视为对象,又将管理视为一套工具和技术。这两个方面之间的联系是KM的本质。然而,对于智力资产,重点更多地放在智力资产产生的影响和价值上,这意味着估值和测量的概念。鉴于领域的进展,需要重新定义集成电路与知识管理概念之间的关系。在我们的论文中,我们假设“IC适合于知识管理评估和绩效测量”:对这项工作中的文献进行概念性回顾应该为这一假设提供基础。进一步可预见的分析验证可能使其成为未来知识管理评价指标设计的基本规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书