Scientific advice in EU for products for treatment of rare diseases

Katrin Rupalla
{"title":"Scientific advice in EU for products for treatment of rare diseases","authors":"Katrin Rupalla","doi":"10.3233/PPL-2010-0270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The national scientific advice procedure can vary from country to country, with some national regulatory agencies not giving advice at all. Usually it is a face-toface meeting, for which there are no pre-specified dates. It can be requested at any time during the development process, also while concerned studies are in progress. The national procedure timelines are flexible and depend upon a local procedure, and can last from two to four months. The procedure is coordinated by a group of national staff, which often includes CHMP and SAWP members of the Agency, but can involve external experts as well. Essentially, the national scientific advice is a national opinion around issues concerning pre-clinical development, clinical development (trial design, statistical methods, RMP, etc), and quality aspects. Any deviation from the advice has to be justified. The advantages of asking a national scientific advice revolve around the flexibility of the procedure, with the possibility of having face-to-face meetings and ask general questions, as well as addressing specific national issues. On the other hand, timelines for the procedures are very variable, in particular when external experts are required. In addition, the national agency may ask the sponsor to go to CHMP for scientific advice. Finally it is important to consider that the national advice is the opinion from a single country and may diverge from the EU-wide position. In fact, the national advice is perceived as non-binding by some EU regulators.","PeriodicalId":348240,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceuticals, policy and law","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceuticals, policy and law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/PPL-2010-0270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The national scientific advice procedure can vary from country to country, with some national regulatory agencies not giving advice at all. Usually it is a face-toface meeting, for which there are no pre-specified dates. It can be requested at any time during the development process, also while concerned studies are in progress. The national procedure timelines are flexible and depend upon a local procedure, and can last from two to four months. The procedure is coordinated by a group of national staff, which often includes CHMP and SAWP members of the Agency, but can involve external experts as well. Essentially, the national scientific advice is a national opinion around issues concerning pre-clinical development, clinical development (trial design, statistical methods, RMP, etc), and quality aspects. Any deviation from the advice has to be justified. The advantages of asking a national scientific advice revolve around the flexibility of the procedure, with the possibility of having face-to-face meetings and ask general questions, as well as addressing specific national issues. On the other hand, timelines for the procedures are very variable, in particular when external experts are required. In addition, the national agency may ask the sponsor to go to CHMP for scientific advice. Finally it is important to consider that the national advice is the opinion from a single country and may diverge from the EU-wide position. In fact, the national advice is perceived as non-binding by some EU regulators.
欧盟对治疗罕见疾病产品的科学建议
国家科学咨询程序因国家而异,有些国家监管机构根本不提供咨询。通常是面对面的会议,没有预先指定的日期。可以在开发过程中的任何时候提出要求,也可以在进行有关研究时提出要求。国家程序时间表是灵活的,取决于当地程序,可能持续两到四个月。该程序由一组国家工作人员进行协调,其中通常包括机构的卫生防护中心和卫生计划成员,但也可以包括外部专家。从本质上讲,国家科学建议是围绕临床前开发、临床开发(试验设计、统计方法、RMP等)和质量方面的问题的国家意见。任何偏离建议的行为都必须是合理的。征求国家科学建议的好处在于程序的灵活性,有可能举行面对面的会议并提出一般性问题,也有可能解决具体的国家问题。另一方面,这些程序的时间表变化很大,特别是在需要外部专家的情况下。此外,国家机构可能会要求申办者去CHMP寻求科学建议。最后,重要的是要考虑到国家建议是来自单个国家的意见,可能与整个欧盟的立场不同。事实上,一些欧盟监管机构认为,各国的建议不具约束力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信