«Dobrudzhan Catastrophy» as a reflection of Russian-Romanian military-political relations in summer–autumn period of 1916.

V. Soloviov
{"title":"«Dobrudzhan Catastrophy» as a reflection of Russian-Romanian military-political relations in summer–autumn period of 1916.","authors":"V. Soloviov","doi":"10.15421/311807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Romania’s entry into the First World War was considered by Russian military-political leadership primarily from the point of view of its own military interests, without taking into account possible negative consequences and prospects of Russian-Romanian military cooperation. According to General Headquarters' estimations, Romanian army attacks in Transylvania, together with Thessaloniki Allied army actions, were to restrain considerable enemy forces and thus ensured the success of Russian army attacks. \nAt the same time, in spite of the fiercest battles on the SWF, the enemy succeeded in forming two new armies in Transylvania by creating a qualitative and quantitative advantage against the 1st and the 2nd Romanian armies operating at this region. When in mid-September of 1916 the need for direct military assistance to Romanian army became obvious for General Alekseyev, who was the immediate Russian army commander, he did not have enough will to insist on his decision. Thus, the South-Western Front attack, which had lost its military significance by that time, was continued. As a result, the plan of military aid to Romania, embodied by General Headquarters, was essentially defensive, and included only indirect assistance, in the form of limited 9th Russian Army attacks from Northern Moldova, and a slight strengthening of the Dobrudzhan army. \nIn addition to this, the incorrect assessment of the situation, both by Russian and Romanian military forces, was obvious. A long pause in enemy's activity in the south, caused by waiting for reinforcements, and enemy's activity in the north, instilled confidence that the main attack would come from there. As a result, all Romanian reserves from the South were transferred to the North, while the enemy struck in the South in Dobrudzh. When Russian General Headquarters realized the consequences of Chernovody-Constanza railway loss, it simply could not transfer Russian military reserves in time. Thus, the lack of coherence between Russian and Romanian sides and their allies, the pursuit of each side's selfish interests led to the loss of military initiative by the allies in Romania, which was completely transferred to the enemy.","PeriodicalId":422792,"journal":{"name":"Modern Studies in German History","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Studies in German History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15421/311807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Romania’s entry into the First World War was considered by Russian military-political leadership primarily from the point of view of its own military interests, without taking into account possible negative consequences and prospects of Russian-Romanian military cooperation. According to General Headquarters' estimations, Romanian army attacks in Transylvania, together with Thessaloniki Allied army actions, were to restrain considerable enemy forces and thus ensured the success of Russian army attacks. At the same time, in spite of the fiercest battles on the SWF, the enemy succeeded in forming two new armies in Transylvania by creating a qualitative and quantitative advantage against the 1st and the 2nd Romanian armies operating at this region. When in mid-September of 1916 the need for direct military assistance to Romanian army became obvious for General Alekseyev, who was the immediate Russian army commander, he did not have enough will to insist on his decision. Thus, the South-Western Front attack, which had lost its military significance by that time, was continued. As a result, the plan of military aid to Romania, embodied by General Headquarters, was essentially defensive, and included only indirect assistance, in the form of limited 9th Russian Army attacks from Northern Moldova, and a slight strengthening of the Dobrudzhan army. In addition to this, the incorrect assessment of the situation, both by Russian and Romanian military forces, was obvious. A long pause in enemy's activity in the south, caused by waiting for reinforcements, and enemy's activity in the north, instilled confidence that the main attack would come from there. As a result, all Romanian reserves from the South were transferred to the North, while the enemy struck in the South in Dobrudzh. When Russian General Headquarters realized the consequences of Chernovody-Constanza railway loss, it simply could not transfer Russian military reserves in time. Thus, the lack of coherence between Russian and Romanian sides and their allies, the pursuit of each side's selfish interests led to the loss of military initiative by the allies in Romania, which was completely transferred to the enemy.
作为1916年夏秋时期俄罗军事政治关系反映的《多布鲁詹大灾难》。
罗马尼亚参加第一次世界大战是俄罗斯军事-政治领导人主要从其自身军事利益的角度考虑的,没有考虑到俄罗斯-罗马尼亚军事合作可能产生的消极后果和前景。根据总指挥部的估计,罗马尼亚军队在特兰西瓦尼亚的进攻,连同塞萨洛尼基盟军的行动,是为了牵制相当多的敌军,从而确保俄军进攻的成功。与此同时,尽管SWF上发生了最激烈的战斗,但敌人在特兰西瓦尼亚成功地组建了两个新军,并在质量和数量上对在该地区作战的罗马尼亚第1集团军和第2集团军取得了优势。1916年9月中旬,对时任俄军司令阿列克谢耶夫将军来说,向罗马尼亚军队提供直接军事援助的必要性变得显而易见,他没有足够的意愿坚持自己的决定。于是,当时已经失去军事意义的西南战线进攻继续进行。因此,由总指挥部制定的对罗马尼亚的军事援助计划基本上是防御性的,只包括间接的援助,即俄罗斯第9集团军从北摩尔多瓦发动有限的进攻,以及稍微加强多布罗德zhan集团军。除此之外,俄罗斯和罗马尼亚军队对局势的错误评估是显而易见的。由于等待援军,敌人在南方的活动停顿了很长时间,而敌人在北方的活动又停顿了很长时间,这使人们逐渐相信,主要的进攻将从那里发起。结果,所有来自南方的罗马尼亚预备队都被转移到北方,而敌人则在南方的多布鲁日发动袭击。当俄罗斯总司令部意识到切尔诺瓦季-康斯坦察铁路损失的后果时,它根本无法及时转移俄罗斯的军事储备。因此,俄罗斯和罗马尼亚双方及其盟友之间缺乏一致性,追求各自的私利,导致盟国在罗马尼亚失去军事主动权,完全转移到敌人手中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信