Why Cervical Vertebrae Do Not Fracture – A Biomechanical Approach Using Loading Tests on Human Vertebrae of A 79-Year-Old Body Donor.

{"title":"Why Cervical Vertebrae Do Not Fracture – A Biomechanical Approach Using Loading Tests on Human Vertebrae of A 79-Year-Old Body Donor.","authors":"","doi":"10.46940/sjomd.02.1009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose: Bone structure alters with increasing age. Material and structural properties are both important for bone strength. Despite having an ageing society, there is a paucity of data from elderly subjects in terms of these parameters. The aim of the present study was to conduct comparative examinations of the structure and material properties of the cervical spine (CS), the thoracic spine (TS) and the lumbar spine (LS), in order to identify both structural and biomechanical differences between the segments of the spine. Methods: We examined central bone cylinders of vertebral bodies C1 to L5 from a 79-year-old body donor in regards to their bone volume fraction (BVF), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th.), separation (Tb.Sp.), trabecular orientation (SMI) and degree of anisotropy (DA). Samples were obtained from all vertebrae with a Jamshidi needle®, and were prepared with a damp cloth in an Eppendorf reaction vessel (1.5 ml). The investigations were performed with a micro-CT device (SKYSCAN 1172, RJL Micro & Analytic GmbH, Germany). Existing deformities and fractures were registered with quantitative computed tomography (QCT). The load tests of the vertebral bodies C1 to L5 were performed on a servo-hydraulic testing machine (MTS 858, MTS Systems Cooperation, Eden Prairie, USA). Results: Regarding BVF (p=0.003), Tb.Th. (p=0.041) and SMI (p=0.012) statistically significant differences were found in the different spinal column sections. The force per area was significantly higher in the CS than in the TS and LS (CS vs. TS, p=0.022; CS vs. LS, p<0.001; TS vs. LS, p=0.012). Conclusion: Due to their unique microarchitecture cervical vertebrae are less prone to fractures than thoracic and lumbar vertebrae. Among the reasons are the higher BVF and Tb.Th. of the cervical vertebrae compared to other vertebrae. Furthermore, the SMI of the CS has more plates than rods. Thus, the CS is characterized by specific features, whose causes must be determined in further investigations.","PeriodicalId":333227,"journal":{"name":"SunKrist Journal of Orthopedics and Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SunKrist Journal of Orthopedics and Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46940/sjomd.02.1009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: Bone structure alters with increasing age. Material and structural properties are both important for bone strength. Despite having an ageing society, there is a paucity of data from elderly subjects in terms of these parameters. The aim of the present study was to conduct comparative examinations of the structure and material properties of the cervical spine (CS), the thoracic spine (TS) and the lumbar spine (LS), in order to identify both structural and biomechanical differences between the segments of the spine. Methods: We examined central bone cylinders of vertebral bodies C1 to L5 from a 79-year-old body donor in regards to their bone volume fraction (BVF), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th.), separation (Tb.Sp.), trabecular orientation (SMI) and degree of anisotropy (DA). Samples were obtained from all vertebrae with a Jamshidi needle®, and were prepared with a damp cloth in an Eppendorf reaction vessel (1.5 ml). The investigations were performed with a micro-CT device (SKYSCAN 1172, RJL Micro & Analytic GmbH, Germany). Existing deformities and fractures were registered with quantitative computed tomography (QCT). The load tests of the vertebral bodies C1 to L5 were performed on a servo-hydraulic testing machine (MTS 858, MTS Systems Cooperation, Eden Prairie, USA). Results: Regarding BVF (p=0.003), Tb.Th. (p=0.041) and SMI (p=0.012) statistically significant differences were found in the different spinal column sections. The force per area was significantly higher in the CS than in the TS and LS (CS vs. TS, p=0.022; CS vs. LS, p<0.001; TS vs. LS, p=0.012). Conclusion: Due to their unique microarchitecture cervical vertebrae are less prone to fractures than thoracic and lumbar vertebrae. Among the reasons are the higher BVF and Tb.Th. of the cervical vertebrae compared to other vertebrae. Furthermore, the SMI of the CS has more plates than rods. Thus, the CS is characterized by specific features, whose causes must be determined in further investigations.
颈椎为何不骨折——对一名79岁人体供体椎体进行载荷试验的生物力学方法
摘要目的:骨结构随年龄的增长而改变。材料和结构特性对骨骼强度都很重要。尽管有一个老龄化的社会,但在这些参数方面,老年受试者的数据缺乏。本研究的目的是对颈椎(CS)、胸椎(TS)和腰椎(LS)的结构和材料特性进行比较检查,以确定脊柱各节段之间的结构和生物力学差异。方法:我们检查了79岁供体C1至L5椎体中央骨柱的骨体积分数(BVF)、小梁厚度(Tb.Th.)、分离度(Tb.Sp.)、小梁取向(SMI)和各向异性程度(DA)。用Jamshidi针®采集所有椎骨标本,用湿布在Eppendorf反应容器(1.5 ml)中制备。使用微型ct设备(SKYSCAN 1172, RJL Micro & Analytic GmbH,德国)进行调查。现有的畸形和骨折用定量计算机断层扫描(QCT)记录。C1至L5椎体的载荷试验在伺服液压试验机(MTS 858, MTS Systems Cooperation, Eden Prairie, USA)上进行。结果:对于BVF (p=0.003),(p=0.041)和SMI (p=0.012)在不同脊柱断面间差异有统计学意义。单位面积的力在CS组明显高于TS组和LS组(CS vs. TS, p=0.022;CS vs. LS, p<0.001;TS vs. LS, p=0.012)。结论:与胸椎和腰椎相比,颈椎因其独特的微结构而不易发生骨折。原因之一是BVF和th较高。颈椎和其他椎骨的对比。此外,CS的SMI有更多的板比棒。因此,CS具有特定的特征,其原因必须在进一步的研究中确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信