Bayesian model averaging over decision trees for assessing newborn brain maturity from electroencephalogram

L. Jakaite, V. Schetinin, C. Maple, J. Schult
{"title":"Bayesian model averaging over decision trees for assessing newborn brain maturity from electroencephalogram","authors":"L. Jakaite, V. Schetinin, C. Maple, J. Schult","doi":"10.1109/UKRICIS.2010.5898148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We use the Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) over Decision Trees (DTs) for assessing newborn brain maturity from clinical EEG. We found that within this methodology an appreciable part of EEG features is rarely used in the DT models, because these features make weak contribution to the assessment. It was identified that the portion of DT models using weak EEG features is large. The negative impact of this is twofold. First, the use of weak features obstructs interpretation of DTs. Second, weak attributes increase dimensionality of a model parameter space needed to be explored in detail. We assumed that discarding the DTs using weak features will reduce the negative impact, and then proposed a new technique. This technique has been tested on some benchmark problems, and the results have shown that the original set of attributes can be reduced without a distinguishable decrease in BMA performance. On the EEG data, we found that the original set of features can be reduced from 36 to 12. Rerunning the BMA on the set of the 12 EEG features has slightly improved the performance.","PeriodicalId":359942,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE 9th International Conference on Cyberntic Intelligent Systems","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE 9th International Conference on Cyberntic Intelligent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/UKRICIS.2010.5898148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We use the Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) over Decision Trees (DTs) for assessing newborn brain maturity from clinical EEG. We found that within this methodology an appreciable part of EEG features is rarely used in the DT models, because these features make weak contribution to the assessment. It was identified that the portion of DT models using weak EEG features is large. The negative impact of this is twofold. First, the use of weak features obstructs interpretation of DTs. Second, weak attributes increase dimensionality of a model parameter space needed to be explored in detail. We assumed that discarding the DTs using weak features will reduce the negative impact, and then proposed a new technique. This technique has been tested on some benchmark problems, and the results have shown that the original set of attributes can be reduced without a distinguishable decrease in BMA performance. On the EEG data, we found that the original set of features can be reduced from 36 to 12. Rerunning the BMA on the set of the 12 EEG features has slightly improved the performance.
从脑电图评估新生儿脑成熟度的贝叶斯决策树平均模型
我们使用贝叶斯模型平均(BMA)对决策树(DTs)评估新生儿脑成熟度从临床脑电图。我们发现,在这种方法中,相当一部分EEG特征很少用于DT模型,因为这些特征对评估的贡献很小。结果表明,利用弱EEG特征的DT模型所占比例较大。这种负面影响是双重的。首先,弱特征的使用阻碍了对dt的解释。其次,弱属性增加了模型参数空间的维数,需要对其进行详细的探索。我们假设丢弃使用弱特征的dt可以减少负面影响,然后提出了一种新的技术。该技术已经在一些基准问题上进行了测试,结果表明可以减少原始属性集,而不会明显降低BMA性能。在EEG数据上,我们发现原来的特征集可以从36个减少到12个。在12个EEG特征集上重新运行BMA略微提高了性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信