Technical efficiency of health-care systems in selected middle-income countries: an empirical investigation

IF 2.2
H. Nassar, Hala Sakr, Asmaa Ezzat, Pakinam Fikry
{"title":"Technical efficiency of health-care systems in selected middle-income countries: an empirical investigation","authors":"H. Nassar, Hala Sakr, Asmaa Ezzat, Pakinam Fikry","doi":"10.1108/reps-03-2020-0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to evaluate the technical efficiency of the health-care systems in 21 selected middle-income countries during the period (2000–2017) and determine the source of inefficiency whether it is transient (short run) or persistent (long run).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe study uses the stochastic frontier analysis technique through employing the generalized true random effects model which overcomes the drawbacks of the previously introduced stochastic frontier models and allows for the separation between unobserved heterogeneity, persistent inefficiency and transient inefficiency.\n\n\nFindings\nPersistent efficiency is lower than the transient efficiency; hence, there are more efficiency gains that can be made by the selected countries by adopting long-term policies that aim at reforming the structure of the health-care system in the less efficient countries such as South Africa and Russia. The most efficient countries are Vietnam, Mexico and China which adopted a social health insurance that covers almost the whole population with the aim of increasing access to health-care services. Also, decentralization in health-care has assisted in adopting health-care policies that are suitable for both the rural and urban areas based on their specific conditions and health-care needs. A key success in the implementation of the adopted long-term policies by those countries is the continuous monitoring and evaluation of their outcomes and comparing them with the predefined targets and conducting any necessary modifications to ensure their movement in the right path to achieve their goals.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nAlthough several studies have evaluated the technical efficiency both across and within countries using non-parametric (data envelopment analysis) and parametric (stochastic frontier analysis) approaches, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first attempt to evaluate the technical efficiency of selected middle-income countries during the period (2000–2017) using the generalized true random effects stochastic frontier analysis model.\n","PeriodicalId":423562,"journal":{"name":"Review of Economics and Political Science","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Economics and Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/reps-03-2020-0038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to evaluate the technical efficiency of the health-care systems in 21 selected middle-income countries during the period (2000–2017) and determine the source of inefficiency whether it is transient (short run) or persistent (long run). Design/methodology/approach The study uses the stochastic frontier analysis technique through employing the generalized true random effects model which overcomes the drawbacks of the previously introduced stochastic frontier models and allows for the separation between unobserved heterogeneity, persistent inefficiency and transient inefficiency. Findings Persistent efficiency is lower than the transient efficiency; hence, there are more efficiency gains that can be made by the selected countries by adopting long-term policies that aim at reforming the structure of the health-care system in the less efficient countries such as South Africa and Russia. The most efficient countries are Vietnam, Mexico and China which adopted a social health insurance that covers almost the whole population with the aim of increasing access to health-care services. Also, decentralization in health-care has assisted in adopting health-care policies that are suitable for both the rural and urban areas based on their specific conditions and health-care needs. A key success in the implementation of the adopted long-term policies by those countries is the continuous monitoring and evaluation of their outcomes and comparing them with the predefined targets and conducting any necessary modifications to ensure their movement in the right path to achieve their goals. Originality/value Although several studies have evaluated the technical efficiency both across and within countries using non-parametric (data envelopment analysis) and parametric (stochastic frontier analysis) approaches, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first attempt to evaluate the technical efficiency of selected middle-income countries during the period (2000–2017) using the generalized true random effects stochastic frontier analysis model.
选定中等收入国家卫生保健系统的技术效率:一项实证调查
本文旨在评估21个选定的中等收入国家在2000-2017年期间卫生保健系统的技术效率,并确定低效率的来源是短暂的(短期)还是持续的(长期)。本研究采用随机前沿分析技术,采用广义真随机效应模型,克服了之前引入的随机前沿模型的缺点,并将未观察到的异质性、持续无效率和短暂无效率区分开来。发现持续效率低于瞬态效率;因此,通过采取旨在改革效率较低的国家(如南非和俄罗斯)的保健系统结构的长期政策,选定的国家可以获得更多的效率收益。效率最高的国家是越南、墨西哥和中国,这些国家采用了几乎覆盖全体人口的社会健康保险,目的是增加获得保健服务的机会。此外,保健领域的权力下放有助于根据农村和城市地区的具体情况和保健需求,制定适合农村和城市地区的保健政策。这些国家在执行所通过的长期政策方面取得的一个关键成功是不断监测和评价其结果,并将其与预先确定的目标进行比较,并进行任何必要的修改,以确保其朝着实现其目标的正确道路前进。虽然有几项研究使用非参数(数据包络分析)和参数(随机前沿分析)方法评估了国家之间和国家内部的技术效率,但据作者所知,这是第一次尝试使用广义真随机效应随机前沿分析模型来评估2000-2017年期间选定的中等收入国家的技术效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书