Rewilding Time in the Vale do Côa

Caitlin DeSilvey
{"title":"Rewilding Time in the Vale do Côa","authors":"Caitlin DeSilvey","doi":"10.5040/9781350065116.ch-012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Opening For much of the twentieth century, both history and ecology were understood to be entities with a certain structure and orientation – gradually progressing along more or less linear paths towards states of increasing stability, set within a shared interpretive framework of succession and serialisation. Now, the storyline has shifted. We live in an era in which concepts of stability have been superseded by an insistence on contingency; singular linear pathways have been replaced with multiple, interleaving possibilities; coherence has given way to complexity. This general shift is evident in both ecological thinking and in contemporary discourses around time and history, and has the effect of troubling foundational precepts and overturning previous assumptions about the way the world works. Some have diagnosed this temporal and ecological upheaval as a signature feature of the Anthropocene, in which the deep past and the deep future are subject to unpredictable processes of interpenetration and cross-contamination, which converge in a volatile present (Dibley 2012). In this chapter, I aim to think temporality and ecology in relation to each other, through the concept of rewilding. In rewilding, I argue, emerging, alternative frameworks of ecology and history are fused, as the desire for restoration (to an imagined ecological baseline) is replaced by an embrace of radical ecological uncertainty (which draws on latent pasts to animate possible futures). In explore these ideas through reference to a specific landscape – the Vale do Côa in north east Portugal.","PeriodicalId":392024,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Historical Time","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking Historical Time","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350065116.ch-012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Opening For much of the twentieth century, both history and ecology were understood to be entities with a certain structure and orientation – gradually progressing along more or less linear paths towards states of increasing stability, set within a shared interpretive framework of succession and serialisation. Now, the storyline has shifted. We live in an era in which concepts of stability have been superseded by an insistence on contingency; singular linear pathways have been replaced with multiple, interleaving possibilities; coherence has given way to complexity. This general shift is evident in both ecological thinking and in contemporary discourses around time and history, and has the effect of troubling foundational precepts and overturning previous assumptions about the way the world works. Some have diagnosed this temporal and ecological upheaval as a signature feature of the Anthropocene, in which the deep past and the deep future are subject to unpredictable processes of interpenetration and cross-contamination, which converge in a volatile present (Dibley 2012). In this chapter, I aim to think temporality and ecology in relation to each other, through the concept of rewilding. In rewilding, I argue, emerging, alternative frameworks of ecology and history are fused, as the desire for restoration (to an imagined ecological baseline) is replaced by an embrace of radical ecological uncertainty (which draws on latent pasts to animate possible futures). In explore these ideas through reference to a specific landscape – the Vale do Côa in north east Portugal.
荒野时间在山谷做Côa
在20世纪的大部分时间里,历史和生态都被理解为具有一定结构和方向的实体——沿着或多或少线性的路径逐渐走向越来越稳定的状态,在一个共同的演替和系列化的解释框架内。现在,故事情节发生了变化。我们生活在这样一个时代:稳定的概念已被对偶然性的坚持所取代;单一的线性路径已经被多个交错的可能性所取代;连贯性已经让位于复杂性。这种普遍的转变在生态思维和围绕时间和历史的当代话语中都很明显,并且对基本戒律产生了困扰,并推翻了之前关于世界运作方式的假设。一些人将这种时间和生态剧变诊断为人类世的一个标志性特征,在这个特征中,深刻的过去和深刻的未来受到不可预测的相互渗透和交叉污染过程的影响,这些过程汇聚在一个不稳定的现在(Dibley 2012)。在这一章中,我的目标是通过重新野化的概念来思考时间性和生态之间的关系。我认为,在野化过程中,新兴的生态和历史的替代框架融合在一起,因为对恢复的渴望(对想象的生态基线)被对激进的生态不确定性的拥抱所取代(它利用潜在的过去来激活可能的未来)。在探索这些想法通过参考一个特定的景观-淡水河谷做Côa在葡萄牙东北部。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信